Books > Business & Economics > Economics > Labour economics
|
Buy Now
Equity for Women in Science - Dismantling Systemic Barriers to Advancement (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R774
Discovery Miles 7 740
|
|
Equity for Women in Science - Dismantling Systemic Barriers to Advancement (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
The first large-scale empirical analysis of the gender gap in
science, showing how the structure of scientific labor and
rewards—publications, citations, funding—systematically
obstructs women’s career advancement. If current trends continue,
women and men will be equally represented in the field of biology
in 2069. In physics, math, and engineering, women should not expect
to reach parity for more than a century. The gender gap in science
and technology is narrowing, but at a decidedly unimpressive pace.
And even if parity is achievable, what about equity? Equity for
Women in Science, the first large-scale empirical analysis of the
global gender gap in science, provides strong evidence that the
structures of scientific production and reward impede women’s
career advancement. To make their case, Cassidy R. Sugimoto and
Vincent Larivière have conducted scientometric analyses using
millions of published papers across disciplines. The data show that
women are systematically denied the chief currencies of scientific
credit: publications and citations. The rising tide of
collaboration only exacerbates disparities, with women unlikely to
land coveted leadership positions or gain access to global
networks. The findings are unequivocal: when published, men are
positioned as key contributors and women are relegated to
low-visibility technical roles. The intersecting disparities in
labor, reward, and resources contribute to cumulative disadvantages
for the advancement of women in science. Alongside their
eye-opening analyses, Sugimoto and Larivière offer solutions. The
data themselves point the way, showing where existing institutions
fall short. A fair and equitable research ecosystem is possible,
but the scientific community must first disrupt its own pervasive
patterns of gatekeeping.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.