0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights > Civil rights & citizenship

Buy Now

To Face Down Dixie - South Carolina's War on the Supreme Court in the Age of Civil Rights (Hardcover) Loot Price: R1,221
Discovery Miles 12 210
To Face Down Dixie - South Carolina's War on the Supreme Court in the Age of Civil Rights (Hardcover): James O Heath

To Face Down Dixie - South Carolina's War on the Supreme Court in the Age of Civil Rights (Hardcover)

James O Heath

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R1,221 Discovery Miles 12 210 | Repayment Terms: R114 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

In an era during which the United States Supreme Court handed down some of its most important decisions, including Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Baker v. Carr (1962), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), three senators from South Carolina- Olin Johnston, Strom Thurmond, and Ernest ""Fritz"" Hollings- waged war on the court's progressive agenda by targeting the federal judicial nominations process. To Face Down Dixie explores these senators' role in some of the most contentious confirmation battles in recent history, including those of Thurgood Marshall, Abe Fortas, and Clement Haynsworth. In scrutinizing Supreme Court nominees and attempting to restrict the power of the nine justices of the court, these senators defied not only the leadership of the Democratic Party but also the Senate traditions of hierarchy and seniority. Along with South Carolina's conservative, segregationist political establishment, which maintained ironclad control over the state's legislature, Johnston, Thurmond, and Hollings effectively drowned out the many moderate voices in South Carolina that remained critical of their obstructionism, thus advancing their own conservative credentials and boosting their chances of reelection. To Face Down Dixie examines for the first time the central role that South Carolina played in turning Supreme Court nomination hearings into confrontational and political public events. James O. Heath argues that the state's war on the court concealed its antipathy to civil rights by using the confirmation process to challenge the court's function as the final arbiter of policy on questions relating to law and order, obscenity, communist subversion, and school prayer. Heath's study illustrates that while South Carolina's history of ""massive resistance"" is less prominent than that of other states, its politicians acted as persistent antagonists in the complex and dramatic debates in the U.S. Senate during the era of civil rights.

General

Imprint: Louisiana State University Press
Country of origin: United States
Release date: December 2017
Authors: James O Heath
Dimensions: 229 x 152 x 31mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover - Cloth over boards
Pages: 344
ISBN-13: 978-0-8071-6836-3
Categories: Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure > General
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights > Civil rights & citizenship
LSN: 0-8071-6836-X
Barcode: 9780807168363

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners