While conflict in cyberspace is not a new phenomenon, the legality
of hostile cyber activity at a state level remains imperfectly
defined. While there is broad agreement among the United States and
its allies that cyber warfare would be governed by existing law of
armed conflict, with no need for additional treaties or conventions
to regulate hostilities online, this view is not shared by many
nations that the United States could potentially face as
adversaries. A range of foreign states use definitions for cyber
conflict that are entirely different from our own, extending to
different concepts of what constitutes online hostilities and even
a state of war. This leads to a potentially dangerous situation
where an adversary could be operating according to an entirely
different understanding of international law to that followed by
the United States. In this Letort Paper, Mr. Keir Giles uses
Russian-language sources and interviews to illustrate the very
distinct set of views on the nature of conflict...
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!