Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Constitution, government & the state
|
Buy Now
Constitutional Originalism - A Debate (Paperback)
Loot Price: R500
Discovery Miles 5 000
You Save: R103
(17%)
|
|
Constitutional Originalism - A Debate (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
List price R603
Loot Price R500
Discovery Miles 5 000
You Save R103 (17%)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much
of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be
called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that
fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should
constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved,
it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories,
some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on
the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea
has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the
assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in
the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a
"living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and
changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal
philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over
into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court
appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court. In
Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum
elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in
order to separate differences that are real from those that are
only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of
contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and
defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from
the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism,
and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the
dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living
Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book
explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers
important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise.
This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay
that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers
and students orient themselves within the literature of the debate.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.