Books > Business & Economics > Industry & industrial studies > Energy industries & utilities
|
Buy Now
DOE Loan Guarantees - Further Actions Are Needed to Improve Tracking and Review of Applications (Paperback)
Loot Price: R431
Discovery Miles 4 310
|
|
DOE Loan Guarantees - Further Actions Are Needed to Improve Tracking and Review of Applications (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R431
Discovery Miles 4 310
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
The Department of Energy (DOE) has made $15 billion in loan
guarantees and conditionally committed to an additional $15
billion, but the program does not have the consolidated data on
application status needed to facilitate efficient management and
program oversight. For the 460 applications to the Loan Guarantee
Program (LGP), DOE has made loan guarantees for 7 percent and
committed to an additional 2 percent. The time the LGP took to
review loan applications decreased over the course of the program,
according to GAO's analysis of LGP data. However, when GAO
requested data from the LGP on the status of these applications,
the LGP did not have consolidated data readily available and had to
assemble these data over several months from various sources.
Without consolidated data on applicants, LGP managers do not have
readily accessible information that would facilitate more efficient
program management, and LGP staff may not be able to identify
weaknesses, if any, in the program's application review process and
approval procedures. Furthermore, because it took months to
assemble the data required for GAO's review, it is also clear that
the data were not readily available to conduct timely oversight of
the program. LGP officials have acknowledged the need for a
consolidated system and said that the program has begun developing
a comprehensive business management system that could also be used
to track the status of LGP applications. However, the LGP has not
committed to a timetable to fully implement this system. The LGP
adhered to most of its established process for reviewing
applications, but its actual process differed from its established
process at least once on 11 of the 13 applications GAO reviewed.
Private lenders who finance energy projects that GAO interviewed
found that the LGP's established review process was generally as
stringent as or more stringent than their own. However, GAO found
that the reviews that the LGP conducted sometimes differed from its
established process in that, for example, actual reviews skipped
applicable review steps. In other cases, GAO could not determine
whether the LGP had performed some established review steps because
of poor documentation. Omitting or poorly documenting reviews
reduces the LGP's assurance that it has treated applicants
consistently and equitably and, in some cases, may affect the LGP's
ability to fully assess and mitigate project risks. Furthermore,
the absence of adequate documentation may make it difficult for DOE
to defend its decisions on loan guarantees as sound and fair if it
is questioned about the justification for and equity of those
decisions. One cause of the differences between established and
actual processes was that, according to LGP staff, they were
following procedures that had been revised but were not yet updated
in the credit policies and procedures manual, which governs much of
the LGP's established review process. In particular, the version of
the manual in use at the time of GAO's review was dated March 5,
2009, even though the manual states it was meant to be updated at
least annually, and more frequently as needed. The updated manual
dated October 6, 2011, addresses many of the differences GAO
identified. Officials also demonstrated that LGP had taken steps to
address the documentation issues by beginning to implement its new
document management system. However, by the close of GAO's review,
LGP could not provide sufficient documentation to resolve the
issues identified in the review.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|