An extensive exploration of the major decisions and personalities of the Supreme Court during the 14-year tenure of Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite. The Waite Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy presents a fresh interpretation of the Supreme Court under the tenure of Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite (1874-1888). An in-depth analysis of key decisions demonstrates how the Waite Court confronted such profound issues as the post-Civil War rights of African Americans and state regulations intended to cope with rampant industrialization. Highlighting the Court's most famous decision, Munn v. Illinois, which upheld legislation regulating railroad and grain elevator rates, this careful analysis also reviews the Court's unique involvement in the 1876 presidential election electoral predicament. Profiles of the 15 justices who served on the Waite Court include extensive descriptions of the five that rank among the most outstanding justices ever to serve on the Supreme Court. A-Z entries on key people, laws, cases, events, and concepts that were relevant during the Waite Court era, including the growing volume of state economic regulations enacted to cope with industrial expansion and urban growth fueled by the Civil War and by a nationwide rail network for people and goods An appendix including a timeline of important events for the years 1865 through 1890, plus excerpts from other important source materials, such as landmark decisions of the Waite Court

This timely collection examines the record of current and recent justices in fashioning the Constitution and looks at the larger political context in which their work has occurred. The eight essays, written by distinguished scholars of the Supreme Court, review the achievements of current Justices O'Connor and Rehnquist as well as recent justices Douglas, Black, and Harlan. The essay on Justice O'Connor is one of the first overall assessments of her record to appear in print. Editor D. Grier Stephenson, Jr.'s introductory chapter presents an insightful overview of the Supreme Court's role in American government today. Collectively these chapters make a rich contribution to an understanding of constitutional government and render a complex subject both accessible to general readers and interesting to experts. Following editor Stephenson's cogent introduction, Henry AbrahaM's Can Presidents Really Pack the Supreme Court? focuses on the political and intellectual environments within which the Supreme Court functions and on the candidates selected by presidents to sit on the High Bench. In Chapter Three, former solicitor general Rex E. Lee zeroes on a central aspect of, and a key player in, the judicial process. Leadership and the relationships among the justices are the subject of Chapter Four. Harold J. Spaeth's essay on Justice Sandra Day O'Connor emphasizes personality as an element contributing to the Court's decisions. The legacy of Justice William O. Douglas and the impact of the Court's past on its present decisions are both examined by Walter Murphy. Similarly, the next chapter's study of Justice John Marshall Harlan shows the importance of the Constitutional legacy in understanding the Supreme Court. Affirmative Action and the Supreme Court reviews the responses of current members of the Court to one of the most divisive and significant policy questions of our time. The concluding essay surveys Chief Justice Rehnquist and the Future of the Supreme Court. This volume is important reading for students of law, history, and political science.

* This is one of the few single volume Con Law texts on the market and is considered compact and accessible to a wide range of students and schools. * In a high-priced text market, the single volume price is a bargain compared to two-volume texts. * Offers the most thorough introductory essays of any text to each of it 15 substantive chapters. * Includes carefully selected and edited cases, keeping the length in check. * Provides a nice complement of end of chapter materials including Key Terms, Selected Readings, and-uniquely-Queries (Discussion Questions) for which the text is noted. * Supplemented by an author-written e-Resource that includes an Instructor's Manual with Test Bank, historical Court documents, noteworthy decisions and dissents, and cases from previous editions. The eighteenth edition of this revered text has been fully revised and updated to include: Discussion of the constitutional implications of the Trump impeachments and recent Supreme Court transitions including the fraught Kavanaugh hearings, the death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and the nomination process surrounding Amy Coney Barrett. Expands the book's longstanding account of all Supreme Court appointments since 1968. Highlights recent attacks on the Supreme Court, including comments by Trump both before and after the 2020 election. Reprints a brief excerpt from oral argument at the Supreme Court. Fourteen new cases carefully edited and excerpted, including Chifalo v. Washington (2020) on the Electoral College, Masterpiece Cakeshop (2018) on the conflict between gay rights and religion, three other new cases on religious freedom, plus three Trump cases as well. Thirty-one additional new cases discussed in chapter essays. Looks at the impact of the COVID-19 crisis in the context of "Security and Freedom in Wartime and Other Crises." Spotlights the US Constitution up front in the text with a prelude hearkening to the Constitutional Convention. Retains a summary of helpful hints on reading and understanding a decision by the Supreme Court.

* This is one of the few single volume Con Law texts on the market and is considered compact and accessible to a wide range of students and schools. * In a high-priced text market, the single volume price is a bargain compared to two-volume texts. * Offers the most thorough introductory essays of any text to each of it 15 substantive chapters. * Includes carefully selected and edited cases, keeping the length in check. * Provides a nice complement of end of chapter materials including Key Terms, Selected Readings, and-uniquely-Queries (Discussion Questions) for which the text is noted. * Supplemented by an author-written e-Resource that includes an Instructor's Manual with Test Bank, historical Court documents, noteworthy decisions and dissents, and cases from previous editions. The eighteenth edition of this revered text has been fully revised and updated to include: Discussion of the constitutional implications of the Trump impeachments and recent Supreme Court transitions including the fraught Kavanaugh hearings, the death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and the nomination process surrounding Amy Coney Barrett. Expands the book's longstanding account of all Supreme Court appointments since 1968. Highlights recent attacks on the Supreme Court, including comments by Trump both before and after the 2020 election. Reprints a brief excerpt from oral argument at the Supreme Court. Fourteen new cases carefully edited and excerpted, including Chifalo v. Washington (2020) on the Electoral College, Masterpiece Cakeshop (2018) on the conflict between gay rights and religion, three other new cases on religious freedom, plus three Trump cases as well. Thirty-one additional new cases discussed in chapter essays. Looks at the impact of the COVID-19 crisis in the context of "Security and Freedom in Wartime and Other Crises." Spotlights the US Constitution up front in the text with a prelude hearkening to the Constitutional Convention. Retains a summary of helpful hints on reading and understanding a decision by the Supreme Court.

Over two centuries of American history the Supreme Court has often become a significant issue in presidential elections, with voters acutely aware that the dominance of one party at the polls may translate into that party's dominance on the nation's highest court. Should Americans presume that votes at the ballot box will have an effect on votes at the Supreme Court on what our Constitution means?

Donald Grier Stephenson Jr. explores the periods when the Court has been an issue in elections -- and when it has not----investigating ten elections in which the Court was clearly an issue and looking also at the election of 1992, in which it could have become a major issue but did not. Drawing from four areas of political history -- party evolution, presidential campaigns, as well as judicial and constitutional development -- Stephenson presents a sophisticated inquiry into the relationship of the Supreme Court to the electoral process and considers whether this recurring electoral phenomenon is a beneficial feature of democratic politics -- or one that ought to be met with concern.