0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All departments
  • All departments
Price
  • R500 - R1,000 (2)
  • R1,000 - R2,500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 matches in All departments

Refugee Roulette - Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform (Paperback): Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I.... Refugee Roulette - Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform (Paperback)
Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I. Schoenholtz, Jaya Ramji-Nogales; Foreword by Edward M. Kennedy
R701 Discovery Miles 7 010 Ships in 7 - 11 working days

Through the Refugee Act of 1980, the United States offers the prospect of safety to people who flee to America to escape rape, torture, and even death in their native countries. In order to be granted asylum, however, an applicant must prove to an asylum officer or immigration judge that she has a well-founded fear of persecution in her homeland. The chance of winning asylum should have little if anything to do with the personality of the official to whom a case is randomly assigned, but in a ground-breaking and shocking study, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Andrew I. Schoenholtz, and Philip G. Schrag learned that life-or-death asylum decisions are too frequently influenced by random factors relating to the decision makers. In many cases, the most important moment in an asylum case is the instant in which a clerk randomly assigns the application to an adjudicator. The system, in its current state, is like a game of chance.

Refugee Roulette is the first analysis of decisions at all four levels of the asylum adjudication process: the Department of Homeland Security, the immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the United States Courts of Appeals. The data reveal tremendous disparities in asylum approval rates, even when different adjudicators in the same office each considered large numbers of applications from nationals of the same country. After providing a thorough empirical analysis, the authors make recommendations for future reform. Original essays by eight scholars and policy makers then discuss the authors' research and recommendations

Contributors: Bruce Einhorn, Steven Legomsky, Audrey Macklin, M. Margaret McKeown, Allegra McLeod, Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Margaret Taylor, and Robert Thomas.

Lives in the Balance - Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security (Hardcover): Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I.... Lives in the Balance - Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security (Hardcover)
Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I. Schoenholtz, Jaya Ramji-Nogales
R1,099 R890 Discovery Miles 8 900 Save R209 (19%) Ships in 10 - 15 working days

Although Americans generally think that the US Department of Homeland Security is focused only on preventing terrorism, one office within that agency has a humanitarian mission. Its Asylum Office adjudicates applications from people fleeing persecution in their homelands. This book provides a careful empirical analysis of how Homeland Security decided these asylum cases over a recent fourteen-year period.

Refugee Roulette - Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform (Hardcover, New): Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I.... Refugee Roulette - Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform (Hardcover, New)
Philip G. Schrag, Andrew I. Schoenholtz, Jaya Ramji-Nogales; Foreword by Edward M. Kennedy
R1,946 R1,548 Discovery Miles 15 480 Save R398 (20%) Ships in 10 - 15 working days

Through the Refugee Act of 1980, the United States offers the prospect of safety to people who flee to America to escape rape, torture, and even death in their native countries. In order to be granted asylum, however, an applicant must prove to an asylum officer or immigration judge that she has a well-founded fear of persecution in her homeland. The chance of winning asylum should have little if anything to do with the personality of the official to whom a case is randomly assigned, but in a ground-breaking and shocking study, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Andrew I. Schoenholtz, and Philip G. Schrag learned that life-or-death asylum decisions are too frequently influenced by random factors relating to the decision makers. In many cases, the most important moment in an asylum case is the instant in which a clerk randomly assigns the application to an adjudicator. The system, in its current state, is like a game of chance.

Refugee Roulette is the first analysis of decisions at all four levels of the asylum adjudication process: the Department of Homeland Security, the immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the United States Courts of Appeals. The data reveal tremendous disparities in asylum approval rates, even when different adjudicators in the same office each considered large numbers of applications from nationals of the same country. After providing a thorough empirical analysis, the authors make recommendations for future reform. Original essays by eight scholars and policy makers then discuss the authors' research and recommendations

Contributors: Bruce Einhorn, Steven Legomsky, Audrey Macklin, M. Margaret McKeown, Allegra McLeod, Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Margaret Taylor, and Robert Thomas.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
JBL T110 In-Ear Headphones (Black)
 (5)
R229 R199 Discovery Miles 1 990
Booksmart
Beanie Feldstein, Kaitlyn Dever, … DVD R150 R98 Discovery Miles 980
Bennett Read Fusion Steam Iron (2200w)
R438 Discovery Miles 4 380
Kingsons Valentine Series Shoulder Bag…
 (2)
R551 R427 Discovery Miles 4 270
Dreambaby Nail Clippers with Holder
R60 R50 Discovery Miles 500
Simply Child Hot Air Balloon Mobile…
R390 Discovery Miles 3 900
Overcomer
Alex Kendrick, Priscilla Shirer, … DVD  (1)
R160 R98 Discovery Miles 980
Wonky Donkey Bag of Books
Craig Smith Paperback  (5)
R399 R299 Discovery Miles 2 990
Casio LW-200-7AV Watch with 10-Year…
R899 R765 Discovery Miles 7 650
Romoss Pure 5 Power Bank…
R199 R146 Discovery Miles 1 460

 

Partners