|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Metaphysics & ontology
Baruch Spinoza began his studies in the Jewish community of
seventeenth century Amsterdam by learning Hebrew and the Talmud,
only to be excommunicated at the age of twenty-four for supposed
heresy. Because of his radical transformation of the concept of
God, he has been characterized, on the one hand, as an atheist, and
on the other as the God-intoxicated man. This book is an
exploration of what Spinoza understood God to be; how, for him, the
infinite and eternal power of God is expressed; and how finite
human beings can have a true idea of this greatest of all entities.
Sherry Deveaux begins with an analytic discussion of these three
questions and an explication of three different views held by
contemporary commentators on Spinoza. She then shows that the
commonly held views about Spinoza are inconsistent with his
texts--especially his magnum opus, the Ethics. Next, she provides
analyses of central topics in Spinoza's metaphysics--such as
'power', 'true idea', and 'essence'--that must be understood in
order to correctly answer the three questions. Deveaux concludes by
arguing (i) that Spinoza defines God's essence as 'absolutely
infinite and eternal power' and (ii) that, far from identifying
God's essence with the divine attributes (such as thought and
extension) as commentators commonly suppose, Spinoza regards God's
essence or power as something that is expressed through the divine
attributes.
Mary Leng offers a defense of mathematical fictionalism, according
to which we have no reason to believe that there are any
mathematical objects. Perhaps the most pressing challenge to
mathematical fictionalism is the indispensability argument for the
truth of our mathematical theories (and therefore for the existence
of the mathematical objects posited by those theories). According
to this argument, if we have reason to believe anything, we have
reason to believe that the claims of our best empirical theories
are (at least approximately) true. But since claims whose truth
would require the existence of mathematical objects are
indispensable in formulating our best empirical theories, it
follows that we have good reason to believe in the mathematical
objects posited by those mathematical theories used in empirical
science, and therefore to believe that the mathematical theories
utilized in empirical science are true. Previous responses to the
indispensability argument have focussed on arguing that
mathematical assumptions can be dispensed with in formulating our
empirical theories. Leng, by contrast, offers an account of the
role of mathematics in empirical science according to which the
successful use of mathematics in formulating our empirical theories
need not rely on the truth of the mathematics utilized.
We are still looking for a satisfactory definition of what makes an
individual being a human individual. The understanding of human
beings in terms of organism does not seem to be satisfactory,
because of its reductionistic flavor. It satisfies our need for
autonomy and benefits our lives thanks to its medical applications,
but it disappoints our needs for conscious and free,
self-determination. For similar reasons, i.e. because of its
anti-libertarian tone, an organicistic understanding of the
relationship between individual and society has also been rejected,
although no truly satisfactory alternative for harmonizing
individual and social wellness has been put forth. Thus, a
reassessment of the very concepts of individual and organism is
needed. In this book, the authors present a specific line of
thought which started with Leibniz' concept of monad in 17th
century, continued through Kant and Hegel, and as a result reached
the first Eastern country to attempt to assimilate, as well as
confront, with Western philosophy and sciences, i.e. Japan. The
line of thought we are tracing has gone on to become one the main
voices in current debates in the philosophy of biology, as well as
philosophical anthropology, and social philosophy. As a whole, the
volume offers a both historical, and systematic account of one
specific understanding of individuals and their environment, which
tries to put together its natural embedding, as well as its
dialectical nature. Such a historical, systematic map will also
allow to better evaluate how life sciences impact our view of our
individual lives, of human activities, of institutions, politics,
and, finally, of humankind in general.
The metaphysical part of this book is largely concerned with
realism issues. Michael Devitt starts with realism about
universals, dismissing Plato's notorious 'one over many' problem.
Several chapters argue for a fairly uncompromisingly realist view
of the external physical world of commonsense and science. Both the
nonfactualism of moral noncognitivism and positivistic
instrumentalism, and defl ationism about truth, are found to rest
on an antirealism that is hard to characterize. A case is presented
for moral realism. Various biological realisms are considered.
Finally, an argument is presented for an unfashionable biological
essentialism.
The second part of the book is epistemological. Devitt argues
against the a priori and for a Quinean naturalism. The intuitions
that so dominate "armchair philosophy" are empirical not a priori.
Throughout the book there is an emphasis on distinguishing
metaphysical issues about what there is and what it's like from
semantic issues about meaning, truth, and reference. Another
central theme, captured in the title, is that we should "put
metaphysics first." We should approach epistemology and semantics
from a metaphysical perspective rather than vice versa. The
epistemological turn in modern philosophy, and the linguistic turn
in contemporary philosophy, were something of disasters.
What do blue things have in common? Or electrons? Or planets?
Distinct things appear to share properties; but what are properties
and what is the best philosophical account of them? A Critical
Introduction to Properties introduces different ontological
accounts of properties, exploring how their formulation is shaped
by the explanatory demands placed upon them. This accessible
introduction begins with a discussion of universals, tropes, sets
and resemblance classes, the major objections to them and their
responses, providing readers with a firm grasp on the competing
ontological accounts of what (if anything) grounds similarity and
difference. It then explores issues concerning the formulation and
justification of property theories such as: how many properties are
there? Should we accept a sparse ontology of properties, or an
abundant one? Can we make a distinction between intrinsic and
extrinsic properties? Do properties have their causal roles
necessarily? What is the relationship between properties and other
metaphysical phenomena such as causality, laws and modality? These
questions get to the heart of why a coherent theory of properties
is so important to metaphysics, and to philosophy more generally.
By concluding with the question of the ontological status of
properties, the reader is introduced to some Carnapian and
contemporary themes about the content and methodology of
metaphysics. For students looking for an accessible resource and a
more comprehensive understanding of contemporary metaphysics, A
Critical Introduction to Properties is a valuable starting point.
Introduction to New Realism provides an overview of the movement of
contemporary thought named New Realism, by its creator and most
celebrated practitioner, Maurizio Ferraris. Sharing significant
concerns and features with Speculative Realism and Object Oriented
Ontology, New Realism can be said to be one of the most prescient
philosophical positions today. Its desire to overcome the
postmodern antirealism of Kantian origin, and to reassert the
importance of truth and objectivity in the name of a new
Enlightenment, has had an enormous resonance both in Europe and in
the US. Introduction to New Realism is the first volume dedicated
to exposing this continental movement to an anglophone audience.
Featuring a foreword by the eminent contemporary philosopher and
leading exponent of Speculative Realism, Iain Hamilton Grant, the
book begins by tracing the genesis of New Realism, and outlining
its central theoretical tenets, before opening onto three distinct
sections. The first, 'Negativity', is a critique of the postmodern
idea that the world is constructed by our conceptual schemas, all
the more so as we have entered the age of digitality and
virtuality. The second thesis, 'positivity', proposes the
fundamental ontological assertion of New Realism, namely that not
only are there parts of reality that are independent of thought,
but these parts are also able to act causally over thought and the
human world. The third thesis, 'normativity,' applies New Realism
to the sphere of the social world. Finally, an afterword written by
two young scholars explains in more detail the relationship between
New Realism and other forms of contemporary realism.
Barry Dainton presents a fascinating new account of the self, the
key to which is experiential or phenomenal continuity.
Provided our mental life continues we can easily imagine ourselves
surviving the most dramatic physical alterations, or even moving
from one body to another. It was this fact that led John Locke to
conclude that a credible account of our persistence conditions - an
account which reflects how we actually conceive of ourselves -
should be framed in terms of mental rather than material
continuity. But mental continuity comes in different forms. Most of
Locke's contemporary followers agree that our continued existence
is secured by psychological continuity, which they take to be made
up of memories, beliefs, intentions, personality traits, and the
like. Dainton argues that that a better and more believable account
can be framed in terms of the sort of continuity we find in our
streams of consciousness from moment to moment. Why? Simply because
provided this continuity is not lost - provided our streams of
consciousness flow on - we can easily imagine ourselves surviving
the most dramatic psychological alterations. Phenomenal continuity
seems to provide a more reliable guide to our persistence than any
form of continuity. The Phenomenal Self is a full-scale defence and
elaboration of this premise.
The first task is arriving at an adequate understanding of
phenomenal unity and continuity. This achieved, Dainton turns to
the most pressing problem facing any experience-based approach:
losses of consciousness. How can we survive them? He shows how the
problem can be solved in a satisfactory manner by construing
ourselves as systems of experiential capacities. He thenmoves on to
explore a range of further issues. How simple can a self be? How
are we related to our bodies? Is our persistence an all-or-nothing
affair? Do our minds consist of parts which could enjoy an
independent existence? Is it metaphysically intelligible to
construe ourselves as systems of capacities? The book concludes
with a novel treatment of fission and fusion.
What is the relation between time and change? Does time depend on
the mind? Is the present always the same or is it always different?
Aristotle tackles these questions in the Physics, and Time for
Aristotle is the first book in English devoted to this discussion.
Aristotle claims that time is not a kind of change, but that it is
something dependent on change; he defines it as a kind of 'number
of change'. Ursula Coope argues that what this means is that time
is a kind of order (not, as is commonly supposed, a kind of
measure). It is universal order within which all changes are
related to each other. This interpretation enables Coope to explain
two puzzling claims that Aristotle makes: that the now is like a
moving thing, and that time depends for its existence on the mind.
Brilliantly lucid in its explanation of this challenging section of
the Physics, Time for Aristotle shows his discussion to be of
enduring philosophical interest.
What do blue things have in common? Or electrons? Or planets?
Distinct things appear to share properties; but what are properties
and what is the best philosophical account of them? A Critical
Introduction to Properties introduces different ontological
accounts of properties, exploring how their formulation is shaped
by the explanatory demands placed upon them. This accessible
introduction begins with a discussion of universals, tropes, sets
and resemblance classes, the major objections to them and their
responses, providing readers with a firm grasp on the competing
ontological accounts of what (if anything) grounds similarity and
difference. It then explores issues concerning the formulation and
justification of property theories such as: how many properties are
there? Should we accept a sparse ontology of properties, or an
abundant one? Can we make a distinction between intrinsic and
extrinsic properties? Do properties have their causal roles
necessarily? What is the relationship between properties and other
metaphysical phenomena such as causality, laws and modality? These
questions get to the heart of why a coherent theory of properties
is so important to metaphysics, and to philosophy more generally.
By concluding with the question of the ontological status of
properties, the reader is introduced to some Carnapian and
contemporary themes about the content and methodology of
metaphysics. For students looking for an accessible resource and a
more comprehensive understanding of contemporary metaphysics, A
Critical Introduction to Properties is a valuable starting point.
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics is the forum for the best new work in
this flourishing field. Much of the most interesting work in
philosophy today is metaphysical in character: this series is a
much-needed focus for it. OSM offers a broad view of the subject,
featuring not only the traditionally central topics such as
existence, identity, modality, time, and causation, but also the
rich clusters of metaphysical questions in neighbouring fields,
such as philosophy of mind and philosophy of science. Besides
independent essays, volumes will often contain a critical essay on
a recent book, or a symposium that allows participants to respond
to one another's criticisms and questions. This fifth volume is
largely focused on the metaphysics of time, with sections on time
travel; persistence through time; and time, space, and location.
The final section of the volume is devoted to a neglected topic
that is starting to attract philosophical attention: the
metaphysics of sounds. Anyone who wants to know what's happening in
metaphysics can start here.
Jaap Mansfeld and Frans de Haas bring together in this volume a
distinguished international team of ancient philosophers,
presenting a systematic, chapter-by-chapter study of one of the key
texts in Aristotle's science and metaphysics: the first book of On
Generation and Corruption. In GC I Aristotle provides a general
outline of physical processes such as generation and corruption,
alteration, and growth, and inquires into their differences. He
also discusses physical notions such as contact, action and
passion, and mixture. These notions are fundamental to Aristotle's
physics and cosmology, and more specifically to his theory of the
four elements and their transformations. Moreover, references to GC
elsewhere in the Aristotelian corpus show that in GC I Aristotle is
doing heavy conceptual groundwork for more refined applications of
these notions in, for example, the psychology of perception and
thought, and the study of animal generation and corruption.
Ultimately, biology is the goal of the series of enquiries in which
GC I demands a position of its own immediately after the Physics.
The contributors deal with questions of structure and text
constitution and provide thought-provoking discussions of each
chapter of GC I. New approaches to the issues of how to understand
first matter, and how to evaluate Aristotle's notion of mixture are
given ample space. Throughout, Aristotle's views of the theories of
the Presocratics and Plato are shown to be crucial in understanding
his argument.
 |
The High Ones
(Hardcover)
Robert Scheige; Cover design or artwork by Robin E Vuchnich
|
R601
Discovery Miles 6 010
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
The Multiple States of the Being is the companion to, and the completion of, The Symbolism of the Cross, which, together with Man and His Becoming according to the Vedanta, constitute Reni Guinon's great trilogy of pure metaphysics. In this work, Guinon offers a masterful explication of the metaphysical order and its multiple manifestations-of the divine hierarchies and what has been called the Great Chain of Being-and in so doing demonstrates how jqana, intellective or intrinsic knowledge of what is, and of That which is Beyond what is, is a Way of Liberation. Guinon the metaphysical social critic, master of arcane symbolism, comparative religionist, researcher of ancient mysteries and secret histories, summoner to spiritual renewal, herald of the end days, disappears here. Reality remains.
The Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius wrote down his thoughts between
170 and 180. He was a late Stoic Philosopher and this one of the
few examples of this type of literature that exists today. The book
is written as personal notes to himself and his thesis is that one
can obtain inner calm irrespective of outer adversity. The text
considers good and evil, solidarity, adversity and inner freedom.
It is a book that offers wisdom, comfort and inspiration. As well
as the thought, this edition contains a biographical sketch and
summary of the philosophy of Marcus Aurelius, a number of
illustrations and both an index and index of terms.
Hans Jonas (1903-1993) was one of the most important German-Jewish
philosophers of the 20th century. A student of Martin Heidegger and
close friend of Hannah Arendt, Jonas advanced the fields of
phenomenology and practical ethics in ways that are just beginning
to be appreciated in the English-speaking world. Drawing here on
unpublished and newly translated material, Lewis Coyne brings
together for the first time in English Jonas's philosophy of life,
ethic of responsibility, political theory, philosophy of technology
and bioethics. In Hans Jonas: Life, Technology and the Horizons of
Responsibility, Coyne argues that the aim of Jonas's philosophy is
to confront three critical issues inherent to modernity: nihilism,
the ecological crisis and the transhumanist drive to
biotechnologically enhance human beings. While these might at first
appear disparate, for Jonas all follow from the materialist turn
taken by Western thought from the 17th century onwards, and he
therefore seeks to tackle all three issues at their collective
point of origin. This book explores how Jonas develops a new
categorical imperative of responsibility on the basis of an
ontology that does justice to the purposefulness and dignity of
life: to act in a way that does not compromise the future of
humanity on earth. Reflecting on this, as we face a potential
future of ecological and societal collapse, Coyne forcefully
demonstrates the urgency of Jonas's demand that humanity accept its
newfound responsibility as the 'shepherd of beings'.
As Vyasa, scribe of the epic Mahabarata, said,
Kant's Elliptical Path explores the main stages and key concepts in
the development of Kant's Critical philosophy, from the early 1760s
to the 1790s. Karl Ameriks provides a detailed and concise account
of the main ways in which the later Critical works provide a
plausible defence of the conception of humanity's fundamental end
that Kant turned to after reading Rousseau in the 1760s. Separate
essays are devoted to each of the three Critiques, as well as to
earlier notes and lectures and several of Kant's later writings on
history and religion. A final section devotes three chapters to
post-Kantian developments in German Romanticism, accounts of
tragedy up through Nietzsche, and contemporary philosophy. The
theme of an elliptical path is shown to be relevant to these
writers as well as to many aspects of Kant's own life and
work.
The topics of the book include fundamental issues in epistemology
and metaphysics, with a new defense of the Amerik's 'moderate'
interpretation of transcendental idealism. Other essays evaluate
Kant's concept of will and reliance on a 'fact of reason' in his
practical philosophy, as well as his critique of traditional
theodicies, and the historical character of his defense of religion
and the concepts of creation and hope within 'the boundaries of
mere reason'. Kant's Elliptical Path will be of value to historians
of modern philosophy and Kant scholars, while its treatment of
several literary figures and issues in aesthetics, politics,
history, and theology make it relevant to readers outside of
philosophy.
This work represents a guided tour to the interdisciplinary,
integrated study of time. Through twenty-two connected essays,
selected from the author's extensive writings, "Time and Time
Again" advances new insights into understanding the nature of time
seen through philosophy, the arts and letters, the sciences of
matter, life, mind and society. Traditionally, attitudes to future,
past, and present remained distinct for different cultures. But
upon the globalizing earth, all cultural regions are now in instant
by instant communication. There is a consequent turmoil about
individual and collective identities and about value judgments, in
all of which attitudes to time play crucial roles. The book
explores this turmoil and, through its references, it also serves
as a guide to the broadly spread literature about time.
|
You may like...
Ultramarathon
James E. Shapiro
Hardcover
R745
Discovery Miles 7 450
|