"After we had exchanged the requisite formalities over tea in
his camp on the southern edge of Kabul's outer defense perimeter,
the Afghan field commander told me that two of his bravest
mujahideen were martyred because he did not have a pickup truck to
take them to a Peshawar hospital. They had succumbed to their
battle wounds. He asked me to tell his party's bureaucrats across
the border that he needed such a vehicle desperately. I
double-checked with my interpreter that he was indeed making this
request. I wasn't puzzled because the request appeared unreasonable
but because he was asking me, a twenty-year-old employee of a
humanitarian organization, to intercede on his behalf with his own
organization's bureaucracy. I understood on this dry summer day in
Khurd Kabul that not all militant and political organizations are
alike." from Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond
While popular accounts of warfare, particularly of
nontraditional conflicts such as guerrilla wars and insurgencies,
favor the roles of leaders or ideology, social-scientific analyses
of these wars focus on aggregate categories such as ethnic groups,
religious affiliations, socioeconomic classes, or civilizations.
Challenging these constructions, Abdulkader H. Sinno closely
examines the fortunes of the various factions in Afghanistan,
including the mujahideen and the Taliban, that have been fighting
each other and foreign armies since the 1979 Soviet invasion.
Focusing on the organization of the combatants, Sinno offers a
new understanding of the course and outcome of such conflicts.
Employing a wide range of sources, including his own fieldwork in
Afghanistan and statistical data on conflicts across the region,
Sinno contends that in Afghanistan, the groups that have
outperformed and outlasted their opponents have done so because of
their successful organization. Each organization's ability to
mobilize effectively, execute strategy, coordinate efforts, manage
disunity, and process information depends on how well its structure
matches its ability to keep its rivals at bay. Centralized
organizations, Sinno finds, are generally more effective than
noncentralized ones, but noncentralized ones are more resilient
absent a safe haven.
Sinno's organizational theory explains otherwise puzzling
behavior found in group conflicts: the longevity of unpopular
regimes, the demise of popular movements, and efforts of those who
share a common cause to undermine their ideological or ethnic kin.
The author argues that the organizational theory applies not only
to Afghanistan-where he doubts the effectiveness of American
state-building efforts but also to other ethnic, revolutionary,
independence, and secessionist conflicts in North Africa, the
Middle East, and beyond."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!