Russell's 1920 primer on Bolshevism, (re-issued in toto except for
the exclusion of a chapter, not written by him anyway), has long
been one of those ??eminal studies every Marxist and Russian
Revolution expert either dips into or learns about from other
experts who have. A curiously luminous heirloom, (just think of the
involuted commentaries spawned in the '40's and '50's), its
interest remains, however, largely historical, a case of betting on
the right horse. For when so many Western apologists, often
disingenuously, heralded the New Jerusalem, Russell after a month's
stay said- with more sorrow than anger-Nyet. He found the Soviet
worker had "no sense whatever of having been liberated from a
tyranny," that love of power is quite as strong a motive, and quite
as great a source of injustice, ?? love of money," and that-
forward looking- Kremlinmania would evolve from "mere
self-preservation, into a policy of imperialism." of course Russell
was then and is still a socialist; therefore postures to the effect
that "the existing capitalist system is doomed" are as prevalent as
the flaw-spotting vis-a-vis economic determinism, class warfare,
the Soviet Constitution and so forth. Essentially Russell ??eared
the movement's messianism, its doled-out dogmas, its belief in
human transformation through force- in short, the means, not the
ends, though even there-in the ??best chapters- he disowns much of
Marx's philosophy, really it's Hegelianism, always ??Russell bete
noire. Short, suggestive notes on Lenin, Trotsky, Gorki. (Kirkus
Reviews)
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!