What are the consequences when politicians make prejudiced
statements? Theories about the suppression of prejudice argue that
people are likely to express more prejudice when they believe that
norms are more permissive than they may have otherwise assumed.
Using a series of experiments carried out during and since the 2016
campaign, Brian Schaffner shows that being exposed to Donald
Trump's prejudiced rhetoric causes people to express more prejudice
themselves. Notably, this is not merely a 'Trump Effect;' people's
commitment to anti-prejudice norms is undermined even when exposed
to prejudiced rhetoric attributed to unnamed politicians. These
findings are consequential; if politicians increasingly feel at
liberty to express explicit prejudice, then the mass public is
likely to take cues from such behavior, leading them to express
more prejudice themselves. This may lead to increasingly heightened
inter-group tensions which could pose a threat to political and
social stability in the United States.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!