Paul explores both how and why U.S. military intervention
decisions are made. Pursuit of that inquiry requires the
identification of decision participants, thorough examination of
the decision making processes they employ, and recognition of
several factors that influence intervention decisions: the national
interest, legitimacy, and the legacies of previous policies. This
book provides chapter length treatment of each of these issues. The
research is based on detailed historical case studies for the four
U.S. Marines on the beach military interventions in Latin America
since World War II: The Dominican Republic (1965), Grenada (1983),
Panama (1989), and Haiti (1994). Additional cases (notably
Afghanistan and Iraq) enter the discussion when considering
findings with broader implications.
Of the existing theories of governance that compete to explain
government policy making, Paul finds that elite theory provides the
best general model for intervention decision making, but that the
notions of both pluralist and class theorists contribute to a
complete explanation, and sometimes in an unexpected way. Findings
also indicate considerable contribution from and constraint by
institutional sources. However, far from finding that institutional
factors are wholly deterministic, this research offers support for
a choice-within-constraints model. Conclusions suggest that top
decision-makers (especially the president) enjoy wide latitude in
framing the national interest and in choosing where to and where
not to intervene.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!