Borders enclose and separate us. We assign to them tremendous
significance. Along them we draw supposedly uncrossable boundaries
within which we believe our individual identities begin and end,
erecting the metaphysical dividing walls that enclose each one of
us into numerically identical, numerically distinct, entities:
persons. Do the borders between us - physical, psychological,
neurological, causal, spatial, temporal, etc. - merit the
metaphysical significance ordinarily accorded them? The central
thesis of I Am You is that our borders do not signify boundaries
between persons. We are all the same person. Variations on this
heretical theme have been voiced periodically throughout the ages
(the Upanishads, Averroes, Giordano Bruno, Josiah Royce,
Schrodinger, Fred Hoyle, Freeman Dyson). In presenting his
arguments, the author relies on detailed analyses of recent formal
work on personal identity, especially that of Derek Parfit, Sydney
Shoemaker, Robert Nozick, David Wiggins, Daniel C. Dennett and
Thomas Nagel, while incorporating the views of Descartes, Leibniz,
Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer, Kant, Husserl and Brouwer. His
development of the implied moral theory is inspired by, and draws
on, Rawls, Sidgwick, Kant and again Parfit. The traditional,
commonsense view that we are each a separate person numerically
identical to ourselves over time, i.e., that personal identity is
closed under known individuating and identifying borders - what the
author calls Closed Individualism - is shown to be incoherent. The
demonstration that personal identity is not closed but open points
collectively in one of two new directions: either there are no
continuously existing, self-identical persons over time in the
sense ordinarily understood - the sort of view developed by
philosophers as diverse as Buddha, Hume and most recently Derek
Parfit, what the author calls Empty Individualism - or else you are
everyone, i.e., personal identity is not closed under known
individuating and identifying borders, what the author calls Open
Individualism. In making his case, the author:
- offers a new explanation both of consciousness and of
self-consciousness
- constructs a new theory of Self
- explains psychopathologies (e.g. multiple personality
disorder, schizophrenia)
- shows Open Individualism to be the best competing explanation
of who we are
- provides the metaphysical foundations for global ethics.
The book is intended for philosophers and the philosophically
inclined - physicists, mathematicians, psychiatrists,
psychologists, linguists, computer scientists, economists, and
communication theorists. It is accessible to graduate students and
advanced undergraduates."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!