"The Judge as Political Theorist" examines opinions by
constitutional courts in liberal democracies to better understand
the logic and nature of constitutional review. David Robertson
argues that the constitutional judge's role is nothing like that of
the legislator or chief executive, or even the ordinary judge.
Rather, constitutional judges spell out to society the
implications--on the ground--of the moral and practical commitments
embodied in the nation's constitution. Constitutional review, in
other words, is a form of applied political theory.
Robertson takes an in-depth look at constitutional decision
making in Germany, France, the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary,
Canada, and South Africa, with comparisons throughout to the United
States, where constitutional review originated. He also tackles
perhaps the most vexing problem in constitutional law today--how
and when to limit the rights of citizens in order to govern. As
traditional institutions of moral authority have lost power,
constitutional judges have stepped into the breach, radically
altering traditional understandings of what courts can and should
do. Robertson demonstrates how constitutions are more than mere
founding documents laying down the law of the land, but
increasingly have become statements of the values and principles a
society seeks to embody. Constitutional judges, in turn, see it as
their mission to transform those values into political practice and
push for state and society to live up to their ideals.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!