An Industrial Age model continues to shape the way the Army
approaches its recruiting, personnel management, training, and
education. This outdated personnel management paradigm--designed
for an earlier era--has been so intimately tied to the maintenance
of Army culture that a self-perpetuating cycle has formed,
diminishing the Army's attempts to develop adaptive leaders and
institutions.
This cycle can be broken only if the Army accepts rapid
evolutionary change as the norm of the new era. Recruiting the
right people, then having them step into an antiquated
organization, means that many of them will not stay as they find
their ability to contribute and develop limited by a centralized,
hierarchical organization. Recruiting and retention data bear this
out.
Several factors have combined to force the Army to think about
the way it develops and nurtures its leaders. Yet, Vandergriff
maintains, mere modifications to today's paradigm may not be
enough. Today's Army has to do more than post rhetoric about
adaptability on briefing slides and in literature. One cannot
divorce the way the Army accesses, promotes, and selects its
leaders from its leadership-development model. The Army cannot
expect to maintain leaders who grasp and practice adaptability if
these officers encounter an organization that is neither adaptive
nor innovative. Instead, Army culture must become adaptive, and the
personnel system must evolve into one that nurtures adaptability in
its policies, practices, and beliefs. Only a detailed,
comprehensive plan where nothing is sacred will pave the way to
cultural evolution.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!