Books > Computing & IT > General theory of computing
|
Buy Now
Pluralism in Software Engineering - Turing Award Winner Peter Naur Explains (Paperback)
Loot Price: R533
Discovery Miles 5 330
|
|
Pluralism in Software Engineering - Turing Award Winner Peter Naur Explains (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R533
Discovery Miles 5 330
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
"What an absolutely cool guy " --- Dennis Shasha, NYU
"Fascinating... very worthwhile" --- Robert Harper, CMU What
mathematical rigor has and has not to offer to software engineers.
Peter Naur wrote his first research paper at the age of 16. Soon an
internationally acclaimed astronomer, Naur's expertise in numerical
analysis gave him access to computers from 1950. He helped design
and implement the influential ALGOL programming language. During
the 1960s, Naur was in sync with the research agendas of McCarthy,
Dijkstra, and others. By 1970, however, he had distanced himself
from them. Instead of joining Dijkstra's structured programming
movement, he made abundantly clear why he disapproved of it.
Underlying Naur's criticism is his plea for pluralism: a computer
professional should not dogmatically advocate a method and require
others to use it in their own work. Instead, he should respect the
multitude of personal styles in solving problems. What philosophy
has to do with software engineering. Though Peter Naur definitely
does not want to be called a philosopher, he acknowledges having
been influenced by Popper, Quine, Russell, and others. Naur's
writings of the 1970s and 1980s show how he borrowed concepts from
philosophy to further his understanding of software engineering. In
later years, he mainly scrutinized the work in philosophy and
mathematical logic & rules in particular. By penetrating deeply
into the 1890 research of William James, Naur gradually developed
his own theory of how mental life is like at the neural level of
the nervous system. This development, in turn, helps explain why he
always opposed the Turing Test and Artificial Intelligence, why he
had strong misgivings about the Formal Methods movement and
Dijkstra's research in particular.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|