The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played
a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU,
having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct
effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations.
Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with
more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream
EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway
offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ
engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it
should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different
approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome
of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a
different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!