It is widely believed that globalization has proceeded to the
point where international economic linkages are as strong as those
within nations. Struck by research suggesting that this perception
is dramatically mistaken, John Helliwell spent three years
assessing the evidence. The results are reported in this book, the
latest in Brookings' Integrating National Economies series. It
provides the most systematic measurements yet available of the
relative importance of global and national economic ties.
The original finding, based on a gravity model of trade flows,
was that 1988 trade linkages between Canadian provinces were twenty
times as dense as those between Canadian provinces and U.S. states
of similar size and distance. A much longer and more detailed body
of data is used to expand and explain these findings. Data for
trade within and among OECD and some developing countries are used
to show that the Canadian-U.S. results are applicable to other
countries. Helliwell then surveys and extends the evidence relating
to price linkages, capital mobility, migration, and knowledge
spillovers, finding in all cases very large border effects.
The evidence offers a challenge to economists, policymakers, and
citizens to explain why national economies have so much staying
power, and to consider whether this is a good or bad thing.
Helliwell argues that since large and small industrial economies
have similar levels of income, there are likely to be diminishing
returns from increases in globalization beyond levels sufficient to
permit the ready exploitation of comparative advantages in trade,
and relatively easy access to knowledge developed elsewhere.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!