The book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in
legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis,
argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic
ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays
contained in this book seek to answer questions concerning the
assumptions standing behind these methods, the limits of using them
and their usefulness in the practice and theory of law. A specific
feature of the book is that in one study four different, sometimes
competing concepts of legal method are discussed. The panorama,
sketched like this, allows one to reflect deeply on the questions
concerning the methodological conditioning of legal science and the
existence of a unique, specific legal method. The authors argue
that there exists no such method. They claim that the methodologies
presented in the book may serve as a basis for constructing a
coherent and useful conception of legal thinking.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!