Political culture and institutions may cause the development of
authoritarian party organizations. Yet, what constitutes their
structure and what explains their changing patterns across time and
space? Conducting a comparative case study among four parties in
the Turkish political system and utilizing the principal-agent
approach to party governance, this study shows how the variance in
interest configurations and the power resources of local party
activists constitute these changing patterns. Musil argues that
exit from intra-party authoritarianism is always a possibility not
only because the party leaders choose to do so, but because the
local party activists can challenge the existing structures by
cultivating their own power resources.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!