Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Financial, taxation, commercial, industrial law > Financial law > Taxation law
|
Buy Now
The problem with Tax-Planning - Avoidance or Evasion (Paperback)
Loot Price: R845
Discovery Miles 8 450
|
|
The problem with Tax-Planning - Avoidance or Evasion (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Scholarly Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Tax /
Fiscal Law, grade: _, Jawaharlal Nehru University (Centre for
Budget and Governance Accountability), course: Economics(Public
Finance & Taxation), language: English, comment: The paper is
an attempt to investigate the current and proposed tax laws of
India with respect to the recent Vodafone case judgement by the
Supreme Court of India. The paper emphasizes that there is a need
to clearly distinguish between the practices of tax evasion, tax
avoidance and tax planning. Though making a clear legal
demarcations is not easy due to various complex structures of
business and particularly tax avoidance practices remain largely
subjective, there is a need of serious thought on this., abstract:
The recent verdict by Supreme Court on Vodafone case generates
fresh debates on whether India needs to review her existing legal
provisions particularly with respect to offshore tax laws. In this
context, formal treatment and clear demarcations between tax
evasion, tax avoidance and tax planning practices are imperative.
The Standing Committee on Finance in its 49th Report on Direct
Taxes Code bill, 2010(submitted to Parliament on 9th march, 2012)
recommended Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFC) rules, Advance
Pricing Agreement (APA) along with General Anti Avoidance
Rule(GAAR) provision to replace the Income Tax Act, 1961 as per the
International Taxation Standard and also in line with the recent
Chinese Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law introduced in 2008 to deal
with offshore transactions via holding companies. Whereas
introduction of GAAR is essential given the limited applications of
a specific or targeted anti avoidance rule, the Committee also
acknowledges the need for an appropriate Dispute Resolution Panel
(DRP) as GAAR might result in a disproportionate discretionary
power for the Income tax authority. The appropriate application of
GAAR provision assumes a crucial role, in particular with countries
lacking
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.