Thomas Brickhouse and Nicholas Smith offer a comprehensive
historical and philosophical interpretation of, and commentary on,
one of Plato's most widely read works, the Apology of Socrates.
Virtually every modern interpretation characterizes some part of
what Socrates says in the Apology as purposefully irrelevant or
even antithetical to convincing the jury to acquit him at his
trial. This book, by contrast, argues persuasively that Socrates
offers a sincere and well-reasoned defense against the charges he
faces. First, the authors establish a consensus of ancient reports
about Socrates' moral and religious principles and show that these
prohibit him from needlessly risking the condemnation of the jury.
Second, they consider each specific claim made by Socrates in the
Apology and show how each can be construed as an honest effort to
inform the jurors of the truth and to convince them of his
blamelessness. The arguments of this book are informed by a
critical review of the scholarly literature and careful attention
to the philosophy expressed in Plato's other early dialogues.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!