Books > Social sciences > Education > Philosophy of education
|
Buy Now
Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment - New Directions in Critical Research (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R2,682
Discovery Miles 26 820
|
|
Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment - New Directions in Critical Research (Hardcover, New)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
This year (2012) marks ten years of No Child Left Behind and the
U.S. federal government's official designation of what qualifies as
"scientifically based research" (SBR) in education. Combined, these
two policies have resulted in a narrowing of education via
standardization and high stakes testing (Au, 2007) as well as the
curtailment of forms of inquiry that are deemed legitimate for
examining education (Wright, 2006). While there has been much
debate about the benefits and limitations of the NCLB legislation
(e.g., Au, 2010) and SBR (e.g., Eisenhart & Towne, 2003),
critical researchers have held strong to their position: The
reductionistic narrowing of education curricula and educational
research cannot solve the present and historical inequities in
society and education (Shields, 2012). Contrarily, reductionism
(via standardization and/or methodological prescription)
exacerbates the challenges we face because it effectively erases
the epistemological, ontological, and axiological diversity
necessary for disrupting hegemonic social structures that lie at
the root of human suffering (Kincheloe, 2004). Not only has NCLB
proven incapable of overcoming inequalities, but there seems to be
sufficient evidence to suggest it was never really intended to
eliminate poverty and human suffering. That is, it seems NCLB,
despite its lofty title and public discourse, is actually designed
to advance the agenda of handing public education over to
for-profit corporations to manage and privatize thereby
intensifying the capitalist class' war on those who rely on a wage
to survive (Malott, 2010). In the present ethos, reductionism
upholds and retrenches the status quo (i.e. the basic structures of
power), and it puts at risk education and educational research as
means of working toward social justice (Biesta, 2007). Because
social justice can be interpreted in multiple ways, we might note
that we understand critical social justice as oriented toward
action and social change. Thus, critical education and research may
have potential to contribute to a number of social justice
imperatives, such as: redistributing land from the neo-colonizing
settler-state to Indigenous peoples, halting exploitative labor
relations and hazardous working conditions for wage-earners, and
engaging in reparations with formerly enslaved communities.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.