Since the Nuremberg Trials of 1945, lawful nations have
struggled to impose justice around the world, especially when
confronted by tyrannical and genocidal regimes. But in Cambodia,
the USSR, China, Bosnia, Rwanda, and beyond, justice has been
served haltingly if at all in the face of colossal inhumanity.
International Courts are not recognized worldwide. There is not a
global consensus on how to punish transgressors.
The war against Al Qaeda is a war like no other. Osama bin Laden,
Al Qaeda's founder, was killed in Pakistan by Navy Seals. Few
people in America felt anything other than that justice had been
served. But what about the man who conceived and executed the 9/11
attacks on the US, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? What kind of justice
does he deserve? The U.S. has tried to find the high ground by
offering KSM a trial - albeit in the form of military tribunal. But
is this hypocritical? Indecisive? Half-hearted? Or merely the best
application of justice possible for a man who is implacably opposed
to the civilization that the justice system supports and is derived
from? In this book, William Shawcross explores the visceral debate
that these questions have provoked over the proper application of
democratic values in a time of war, and the enduring dilemma posed
to all victors in war: how to treat the worst of your enemies.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!