"DIARY OF A SEDUCER: BIOGRAPHY NOT AUTHORIZED" is a masterpiece of double character: fiction and, at the same time, also not fiction. This is, among other things, in the first and second drive, in a poetic form, in the form of a novel, it recounts, in spite of the first person, the fictional adventures and/or everyday situations amorous of a young millionaire, even in the house of the thirty years which, in turn, becomes his life only if concentrating on earning more money and, on the same track, collect also the greatest possible number of women, is not making distinction of color, social position or religion, simply-if only that they are beautiful, stunning, thus becoming also an eminent master the art of woo. (The author)

They were, and still today - at the dawn of the 21st century - many are those who, driven by political-economic ideas of Marxist thought, advocated and recommend the "end of capitalism." Or is advocated, and recommend that, following a dynamic process material and/or naturally dialectic of history, the political society would be capitalist and/or will also, of course, incorporated by civil society, giving rise to a society dictates perfect, without classes, in which all men excluded, in it, finally would be free of injustices and/or social inequalities. What is evident, however, is that, historically, capitalism, in spite of going through many crises and by also being a political system whose economic your class and /or social group has, by nature, as a principle, disaggregate more members of that exactly aggregate, he always maintained its hegemony. That is, he (capitalism), contrary to the Marxist theses on your supposed order, on the other hand, according to the already first analyzes political-economic of Italian Antonio Gramsci, from the 20th century, also brought with him the call "Hegemony," making it with that - through the ideological character of it - if went down they could switch over and not only did not affect his "natural dialectic of history." Or is, in other words, becoming with which he, capitalism itself, while political society, by means of the ideology, remained as dominant class and were not incorporated by "civil society," in the sense visionary of Marx, according to which, as already mentioned, but who here also worth reiterating, even if it would dissolve, giving rise to the so-called "perfect society and/or without classes." In this sense, the objective of our work is to carry out a study on the problems regarding the ideological relations between the call, here, "Society of the rich without money" and capitalism, in so far as the latter, while political society has, in western societies post-modern capitalist, systemized and diffused in horror of socio-cultural proletariats, (in the form of values and principles for these internalized) the ideals and capitalist ideas, "cooptando" (internalizeding in them the capitalist values), without, however, in that same ideological process, on providing great social and/or redistribute material means also of social production of existence. This, for us, it is evident as being one of the most radical and, at the same time subtle, forms of capitalist hegemony present in the 21st century. For this track - as we will see further in the course of our work - there are two essential aspects, while epistemological assumptions that define and/or qualify the members belonging to this so-called "Society of the rich without money," present in western capitalist societies post-modern, namely: 1-The fact of the individuals belonging to it, to this "society of the rich without money," they are always, through the use alienated and/or addict of bank credits, "increasing almost always the power of consumption without, however, in those cases, also increase their rents," making it well (while a significant group of individuals belonging to call active population) "wage slaves of capital," i.e., being placed, by the ideology of the capital, in the quality of disgust and dehumanized slaves-proletarians, selling their labor forces only for pay, the first track: a-High rates of taxes to governments capitalist and, in the second: b-High interest rates the economic elites (banks, financial institutions, etc. ). 2-The fact of the same, while excluded from social, seeing still at that school success and/or access to the upper level and/or one of the greatest possibilities (ideologically preached by capitalists) to reach the "upward social mobility," i.e. to achieve the social ascent via the high degree of study and/or the access to undergraduate and post-graduate, in so far as, in the same way, it has been - for centuries by signal - established also in those same...

There are many forms of dehumanization, and one of them, perhaps the most crucial, is that this systematic disregard the differences, to the extent that such disrespect - toward micro - leads the individual to far from their ability to coexist and, consequently, too far away from the possibility of learning, personal growth and development; In order macro, leads to society for "xenofobismos," excessive nationalism, "genocidismos," "biocidismos," apartheids, economic exclusion and for forms unilateral and orthodox view of the world, culminating in wars, armed conflicts, hatred and political positions radical and extreme. However, you cannot and must not lose hope even that, for many, it is just one more utopia. It is important that even if you believe that man can change, it can be transformed. Or rather, it is necessary that if you believe, as we would say Nietzsche, that "the man needs to be overcome." As all the works on human development by me produced, this also brings an addendum, a second unit, as thematic supplement on the possibilities of change, humanization and development of be. We hope, therefore, that this work, like many others, can be useful for the formation of a more just and democratic society, in so far as it is able to contribute to the formation of a generation less alienated and uncompromising with the social causes, economic and humanitarian .

ABOUT "WISE, PROSPEROUS AND HAPPY" - In the world in which we live, many people want to prosper; they have been looking for much if it makes an effort, sacrificing, many people, the life itself, the body itself, to be able to manage to get rich. In other words, many people finish forgetting of that, so important all that will work, is necessary also power it is developed intellectually. In another road, trying to get rich also at any price, many people have a tendency to want to accumulate properties, material things, believing that, acting so, they will be rich. However, it is necessary to say that there is nothing that is more valuable than the wisdom. It is the wisdom that creates the prosperity. In this sense, the prosperity, when in fact reached, must be used to favor still more the development of the wisdom itself and not only or exclusively directional for the exercise and the practice of the consumption, or even for the goods accumulation.

The companies of the capital, from the development of the Cultural Industry, created two standardized types and ideals of men and women, even if somewhat paradoxical in themselves as, for example: 1- The men who, at the same time, are rich, intelligent, ' imagery, elegant, faithful to their beloved, smoochy, parents, etc., i.e., the perfect fictional representations of the princes delighted; 2-The women who, at the same time, are called the type of family, Debrett, faithful, housewives, mothers of the family and, in another way, the dictates sexual slaves, seductive, etc. As you can see, these two ideals so-called perfect for men and women are paradoxical and, therefore, do not exist in the real world. Or is, in the real world, outside of fiction, men so-called rich (stereotypes of prince charmed), so-called beautiful, ' imagery, elegant, etc., with rare exceptions, are not in search of a single woman for relationships, but several, using them as disposable products and, in this sense, are also not looking for being parents of family. That is, the men, in these conditions, do not love: they, with rare exceptions, are only, by many women, loved and idealized as a solution to their lives. On The other hand, the female, it is the same: "Many women who seek, at all costs - making bands, classes intense of academy, putting prostheses silicone, etc. -, investing massively in search of beauty, trying to, thus, entering the default said of beauty, do not do so in order to be able to love, but to be loved and/or desired by not only one, but by many men." In other words, you want to say is that, all those who, on a voluntary basis and/or unintentionally end up being framed within the standards of aesthetic beauty defined by cultural industry, naturally become also, such as products, into objects of consumption of all others, inside or outside of the standard and, in this sense, they are treated as disposable human being. In other words, men and women who find themselves within these patterns, psychosocial terms are also placed, even if unconsciously, only to be desired and/or beloved, as objects of consumption, and not for love and/or wish. This might explain why it is that there is, in these societies, a multitude of men and women who are, in the popular "turning from hand to hand," in search of their so-called peers and/or ideal partners. In other words, what you want and that we must also say that: "The men (the stereotyped princes), in capitalist societies post-modern, are trained to want women said easy, said experienced sexual, for the realization of their satisfactions and sexual exploits." However, at the time of getting married, they prefer those who have been no and/or even very few sexual experiences and, in addition, that demonstrate be with them not by what they have, by money that may have, but by feelings (covert) still that they may come to cultivate for them. The prejudice of man in relation to the few sexual experiences on the part of the woman is precisely linked to the question of the size of the penis and the issue of virginity, regarding the establishment, in his mind, two myths, respectively: 1- Among the men there is the myth that the woman who, supposedly, has had many sexual experiences, just having the vagina "enlarged," weary beyond the mind, always feeling the desire to continue with these experiences, in a ceaseless quest for a penis great that satisfies, never being her, however, fully satisfied, even after being married, which will lead, supposedly, for them, to commit possible adulteries. 2-Among men is also disseminated the idea, the myth that the man with whom the woman loses virginity is never totally forgotten by it, and that even he is replaced by eternal powers of seduction on it. These two cases, for the men (of type princes), with rare exceptions, are what prevent them from even cogitate the possibility to marry with the women that they only "174-5," especially those in which he and

ABOUT "HUMANIZATION & INTELLECTUAL EMANCIPATION" "HUMANIZATION & INTELLECTUAL EMANCIPATION" it was born from a rereading, was born from the necessity of a new sense happening to the existent paradox between the thought of two great philosophers: Aristotle's, thinker of origin Macedonia, divergent disciple of Platao, of ancient Greece, (a.c); and Jean Paul Sartre (1905-1980) existentialist philosopher of the century XX. The problematic is situated between two different theories of to be: That of Aristotle's, centered in the conceptions of the Act and of the Power, characterized in the finalities of the being, in other words, of what the being can become from what if it is; And the conception of Sartre, opposite that of Aristotle's, which extols what is the being that is, in other words, that is not a being closed in itself, in a nature, but opened for a human condition. The new sense, the rereading, consists exactly of a more deepened study, specifically what concerns the conceptions man's Aristotelians, in which it is glimpsed, is discovered, two different senses for the term finality: The first like objective thing (target to be reached); The second as end to which something destines (predetermination). What is solved is that, all the other beings, in the theory of the Act and of the Power of Aristotle's, differently of the man, are conceived like being to be irrational, and, so, inside a finality conception, for the nature, determinist or daily pay - determinist. However, as for the man, there is a finality, but I do not eat predetermination, and yes like target to be reached. In other words, something exists in opened, one "that to do" I humanize, a condition that needs to be reached so that the man becomes a man in fact, very much besides him simply man is born, to grow and to die. Aristotle's was defining the man like a rational being for nature (but like target to be reached and not in the direction of determination) and it was considering the rational activity, the act of thinking, like the extract of this stated finality, i.e. like surviving the power in accordance with his reason.