|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
Product information not available.
In The Civil War on the River Lines of Virginia, 1862-1864, Trask
argues that the bloody engagements on the river lines were the most
important battles of the Civil War in the East, far surpassing even
the dramatic contests at Antietam and Gettysburg in significance.
During the Civil War, the Union and the Confederacy fought for
possession of the land between Culpeper Court House and
Fredericksburg in east-central Virginia from December 1862 to May
1864, waging four great battles at Fredericksburg,
Chancellorsville, the Wilderness, and Spotsylvania Court House. The
Rappahannock and Rapidan Rivers flowed through the area. It was the
only defensible stronghold between Washington, D.C. and Richmond,
the capitals of the belligerent nations. Its loss would doom the
Southern cause in Virginia. When the army of General Ulysses S.
Grant finally evicted General Robert E. Lee's troops from the river
lines, he soon marched to the James River and lay siege to
Petersburg and Richmond. Eventually, Grant achieved the final
victory of the union in the eastern theater of war. This book is
the first to analyze and evaluate all of the struggles on the river
lines in one book.
Underscoring an emerging revisionist view of the American
Expeditionary Forces, David Trask argues that the performances of
the AEF and General John J. Pershing were much more flawed than
conventional accounts have suggested. This can best be seen, he
shows, by analyzing coalition warfare at the level of grand tactics
i.e., campaign military operations. The AEF didn't perform well in
France, Trask contends, because it was committed as an independent
force before it had time to train and gain experience. President
Wilson and General Pershing's initial insistence on an independent
American force rather than an integration with existing French and
British armies resulted in costly delays and bitter victories in
the decisive Allied counteroffensives against Ludendorff and the
Central Powers. Using a tactic uncommon in previous studies of the
AEF, David Trask views the campaign of 1918 through the eyes of the
highest-ranking of field commanders, including Pershing, Marshal
Ferdinand Foch of the Allied and Associated Powers, and General
Erich Ludendorff of the Central Powers. Trask's portrayal of
Pershing reveals a self-righteous leader who was unwilling to
correct initial misconceptions that marred the doctrine and
training of the AEF. Consequently, Trask demonstrates, Pershing's
stormy relations with Allied military and civilian leader seriously
undermined the AEF and its efforts to conduct coalition warfare.
|
|