|
|
Showing 1 - 15 of
15 matches in All Departments
In late antiquity the rising number of ascetics who joined the
priesthood faced a pastoral dilemma. Should they follow a
traditional, demonstrably administrative, approach to pastoral
care, emphasizing doctrinal instruction, the care of the poor, and
the celebration of the sacraments? Or should they bring to the
parish the ascetic models of spiritual direction, characterized by
a more personal spiritual father/spiritual disciple relationship?
Five Models of Spiritual Direction in the Early Church explores the
struggles of five clerics (Athanasius, Gregory Nazianzen, Augustine
of Hippo, John Cassian, and Pope Gregory I) to reconcile their
ascetic idealism with the reality of pastoral responsibility.
Through a close reading of Greek and Latin texts, George E.
Demacopoulos explores each pastor's criteria for ordination, his
supervision of subordinate clergy, and his methods of spiritual
direction. He argues that the evolution in spiritual direction that
occurred during this period reflected and informed broader
developments in religious practices. Demacopoulos describes the way
in which these authors shaped the medieval pastoral traditions of
the East and the West. Each of the five struggled to balance the
tension between his ascetic idealism and the realities of the lay
church. Each offered distinct (and at times very different)
solutions to that tension. The diversity among their models of
spiritual direction demonstrates both the complexity of the problem
and the variable nature of early Christianity. Scholars and
students of late antiquity, the history of Christianity, and
historical theology will find a great deal of interest in Five
Models of Spiritual Direction in the Early Church. The book will
also appeal to those who are actively engaged in Christian
ministry.
|
Faith, Reason, and Theosis (Paperback)
Aristotle Papanikolaou, George E. Demacopoulos; Contributions by William J. Abraham, Peter C. Bouteneff, Carolyn Chau, …
|
R853
Discovery Miles 8 530
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
Theosis shapes contemporary Orthodox theology in two ways:
positively and negatively. In the positive sense, contemporary
Orthodox theologians made theosis the thread that bound together
the various aspects of theology in a coherent whole and also
interpreted patristic texts, which experienced a renaissance in the
twentieth century, even in Orthodox theology. In the negative
sense, contemporary theologians used theosis as a triumphalistic
club to beat down Catholic and Protestant Christians, claiming that
they rejected theosis in favor of either a rationalistic or
fideistic approach to Christian life. The essays collected in this
volume move beyond this East–West divide by examining the
relation between faith, reason, and theosis from Orthodox,
Catholic, and Protestant perspectives. A variety of themes are
addressed, such as the nature–grace debate and the relation of
philosophy to theology, through engagement with such diverse
thinkers as Thomas Aquinas, John Wesley, Meister Eckhart, Dionysius
the Areopagite, Symeon the New Theologian, Panayiotis Nellas,
Vladimir Lossky, Martin Luther, Martin Heidegger, Sergius Bulgakov,
John of the Cross, Delores Williams, Evagrius of Pontus, and Hans
Urs von Balthasar. The essays in this book are situated within a
current thinking on theosis that consists of a common, albeit
minimalist, affirmation amidst the flow of differences. The authors
in this volume contribute to the historical theological task of
complicating the contemporary Orthodox narrative, but they also
continue the “theological achievement” of thinking about
theosis so that all Christian traditions may be challenged to
stretch and shift their understanding of theosis even amidst an
ecumenical celebration of the gift of participation in the life of
God.
Orthodox Readings of Augustine examines the theological engagement
with the preeminent Latin theologian Augustine of Hippo in the
Orthodox context. Augustine was not widely read in the East until
many centuries after his death. However, following his
re-introduction in the thirteenth century, the Latin Church Father
served as an ecumenical figure, offering Latin and Byzantine
theologians a thinker with whom they could bridge linguistic,
cultural, and confessional divides. Contributors: Lewis Ayres, John
Behr, David Bradshaw, Brian E. Daley, George E. Demacopoulos,
Elizabeth Fisher, Reinhard Flogaus, Carol Harrison, David Bentley
Hart, Joseph T. Lienhard, Andrew Louth, Jean-Luc Marion, Aristotle
Papanikolaou, and David Tracy
This book reexamines the concepts of fundamentalism and religious
Orthodoxy in the contemporary world. It brings together twelve
essays by some of the leading scholars on Orthodox Christianity
that explore the relationship between Orthodoxy and fundamentalist
ideas and practices, both in countries and regions where Orthodox
Christianity has been the dominant and traditional faith, and in
the "New World," where Orthodox Christian communities constitute a
minority. The main issues that the contributors explore include
fundamentalism as a religious and ideological phenomenon, the
relationship between fundamentalism, traditionalism and modernity,
fundamentalism in the contemporary Orthodox world, fundamentalist
responses to the issues of modernization, pluralism, and democracy,
Orthodox Christian responses to political liberalism and
secularism, and Orthodox theology and the construction of the
(fundamentalist) self.
Colonizing Christianity employs postcolonial critique to analyze
the transformations of Greek and Latin religious identity in the
wake of the Fourth Crusade. Through close readings of texts from
the period of Latin occupation, this book argues that the
experience of colonization splintered the Greek community over how
best to respond to the Latin other while illuminating the
mechanisms by which Western Christians authorized and exploited the
Christian East. The experience of colonial subjugation opened
permanent fissures within the Orthodox community, which struggled
to develop a consistent response to aggressive demands for
submission to the Roman Church.
Gregory the Great (bishop of Rome from 590 to 604) is one of the
most significant figures in the history of Christianity. His
theological works framed medieval Christian attitudes toward
mysticism, exegesis, and the role of the saints in the life of the
church. The scale of Gregory's administrative activity in both the
ecclesial and civic affairs of Rome also helped to make possible
the formation of the medieval papacy. Gregory disciplined
malcontent clerics, negotiated with barbarian rulers, and oversaw
the administration of massive estates that employed thousands of
workers. Scholars have often been perplexed by the two sides of
Gregory-the monkish theologian and the calculating administrator.
George E. Demacopoulos's study is the first to advance the argument
that there is a clear connection between the pontiff's thought and
his actions. By exploring unique aspects of Gregory's ascetic
theology, wherein the summit of Christian perfection is viewed in
terms of service to others, Demacopoulos argues that the very
aspects of Gregory's theology that made him distinctive were
precisely the factors that structured his responses to the
practical crises of his day. With a comprehensive understanding of
Christian history that resists the customary bifurcation between
Christian East and Christian West, Demacopoulos situates Gregory
within the broader movements of Christianity and the Roman world
that characterize the shift from late antiquity to the early Middle
Ages. This fresh reading of Gregory's extensive theological and
practical works underscores the novelty and nuance of Gregory as
thinker and bishop.
On the first anniversary of his election to the papacy, Leo the
Great stood before the assembly of bishops convening in Rome and
forcefully asserted his privileged position as the heir of Peter
the Apostle. This declaration marked the beginning of a powerful
tradition: the Bishop of Rome would henceforth leverage the cult of
St. Peter, and the popular association of St. Peter with the city
itself, to his advantage. In The Invention of Peter, George E.
Demacopoulos examines this Petrine discourse, revealing how the
link between the historic Peter and the Roman Church strengthened,
shifted, and evolved during the papacies of two of the most
creative and dynamic popes of late antiquity, ultimately shaping
medieval Christianity as we now know it. By emphasizing the ways in
which this rhetoric of apostolic privilege was employed, extended,
transformed, or resisted between the reigns of Leo the Great and
Gregory the Great, Demacopoulos offers an alternate account of
papal history that challenges the dominant narrative of an
inevitable and unbroken rise in papal power from late antiquity
through the Middle Ages. He unpacks escalating claims to
ecclesiastical authority, demonstrating how this rhetoric, which
almost always invokes a link to St. Peter, does not necessarily
represent actual power or prestige but instead reflects moments of
papal anxiety and weakness. Through its nuanced examination of an
array of episcopal activity-diplomatic, pastoral, political, and
administrative-The Invention of Peter offers a new perspective on
the emergence of papal authority and illuminates the influence that
Petrine discourse exerted on the survival and exceptional status of
the Bishop of Rome.
Winner of the 2017 Alpha Sigma Nu Award The collapse of communism
in eastern Europe has forced traditionally Eastern Orthodox
countries to consider the relationship between Christianity and
liberal democracy. Contributors examine the influence of
Constantinianism in both the post-communist Orthodox world and in
Western political theology. Constructive theological essays feature
Catholic and Protestant theologians reflecting on the relationship
between Christianity and democracy, as well as Orthodox theologians
reflecting on their tradition's relationship to liberal democracy.
The essays explore prospects of a distinctively Christian politics
in a post-communist, post-Constantinian age.
Traditional, secular, and fundamentalist-all three categories are
contested, yet in their contestation they shape our sensibilities
and are mutually implicated, the one with the others. This
interplay brings to the foreground more than ever the question of
what it means to think and live as Tradition. The Orthodox
theologians of the twentieth century, in particular, have
emphasized Tradition not as a dead letter but as a living presence
of the Holy Spirit. But how can we discern Tradition as living
discernment from fundamentalism? What does it mean to live in
Tradition when surrounded by something like the "secular"? These
essays interrogate these mutual implications, beginning from the
understanding that whatever secular or fundamentalist may mean,
they are not Tradition, which is historical, particularistic, in
motion, ambiguous and pluralistic, but simultaneously not
relativistic. Contributors: R. Scott Appleby, Nikolaos Asproulis,
Brandon Gallaher, Paul J. Griffiths, Vigen Guroian, Dellas Oliver
Herbel, Edith M. Humphrey, Slavica Jakelic, Nadieszda Kizenko,
Wendy Mayer, Brenna Moore, Graham Ward, Darlene Fozard Weaver
The category of the 'West' has played a particularly significant
role in the modern Eastern Orthodox imagination. It has functioned
as an absolute marker of difference from what is considered to be
the essence of Orthodoxy, and, thus, ironically, has become a
constitutive aspect of the modern Orthodox self. The essays
collected in this volume examines the many factors that contributed
to the 'Eastern' construction of the 'West' in order to understand
why the 'West' is so important to the Eastern Christian's sense of
self.
Traditional, secular, and fundamentalist-all three categories are
contested, yet in their contestation they shape our sensibilities
and are mutually implicated, the one with the others. This
interplay brings to the foreground more than ever the question of
what it means to think and live as Tradition. The Orthodox
theologians of the twentieth century, in particular, have
emphasized Tradition not as a dead letter but as a living presence
of the Holy Spirit. But how can we discern Tradition as living
discernment from fundamentalism? What does it mean to live in
Tradition when surrounded by something like the "secular"? These
essays interrogate these mutual implications, beginning from the
understanding that whatever secular or fundamentalist may mean,
they are not Tradition, which is historical, particularistic, in
motion, ambiguous and pluralistic, but simultaneously not
relativistic. Contributors: R. Scott Appleby, Nikolaos Asproulis,
Brandon Gallaher, Paul J. Griffiths, Vigen Guroian, Dellas Oliver
Herbel, Edith M. Humphrey, Slavica Jakelic, Nadieszda Kizenko,
Wendy Mayer, Brenna Moore, Graham Ward, Darlene Fozard Weaver
Colonizing Christianity employs postcolonial critique to analyze
the transformations of Greek and Latin religious identity in the
wake of the Fourth Crusade. Through close readings of texts from
the period of Latin occupation, this book argues that the
experience of colonization splintered the Greek community over how
best to respond to the Latin other while illuminating the
mechanisms by which Western Christians authorized and exploited the
Christian East. The experience of colonial subjugation opened
permanent fissures within the Orthodox community, which struggled
to develop a consistent response to aggressive demands for
submission to the Roman Church.
|
Faith, Reason, and Theosis (Hardcover)
Aristotle Papanikolaou, George E. Demacopoulos; Contributions by William J. Abraham, Peter C. Bouteneff, Carolyn Chau, …
|
R3,756
Discovery Miles 37 560
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
Theosis shapes contemporary Orthodox theology in two ways:
positively and negatively. In the positive sense, contemporary
Orthodox theologians made theosis the thread that bound together
the various aspects of theology in a coherent whole and also
interpreted patristic texts, which experienced a renaissance in the
twentieth century, even in Orthodox theology. In the negative
sense, contemporary theologians used theosis as a triumphalistic
club to beat down Catholic and Protestant Christians, claiming that
they rejected theosis in favor of either a rationalistic or
fideistic approach to Christian life. The essays collected in this
volume move beyond this East–West divide by examining the
relation between faith, reason, and theosis from Orthodox,
Catholic, and Protestant perspectives. A variety of themes are
addressed, such as the nature–grace debate and the relation of
philosophy to theology, through engagement with such diverse
thinkers as Thomas Aquinas, John Wesley, Meister Eckhart, Dionysius
the Areopagite, Symeon the New Theologian, Panayiotis Nellas,
Vladimir Lossky, Martin Luther, Martin Heidegger, Sergius Bulgakov,
John of the Cross, Delores Williams, Evagrius of Pontus, and Hans
Urs von Balthasar. The essays in this book are situated within a
current thinking on theosis that consists of a common, albeit
minimalist, affirmation amidst the flow of differences. The authors
in this volume contribute to the historical theological task of
complicating the contemporary Orthodox narrative, but they also
continue the “theological achievement” of thinking about
theosis so that all Christian traditions may be challenged to
stretch and shift their understanding of theosis even amidst an
ecumenical celebration of the gift of participation in the life of
God.
Gregory the Great (bishop of Rome from 590 to 604) is one of the
most significant figures in the history of Christianity. His
theological works framed medieval Christian attitudes toward
mysticism, exegesis, and the role of the saints in the life of the
church. The scale of Gregory's administrative activity in both the
ecclesial and civic affairs of Rome also helped to make possible
the formation of the medieval papacy. Gregory disciplined
malcontent clerics, negotiated with barbarian rulers, and oversaw
the administration of massive estates that employed thousands of
workers. Scholars have often been perplexed by the two sides of
Gregory—the monkish theologian and the calculating administrator.
George E. Demacopoulos's study is the first to advance the argument
that there is a clear connection between the pontiff's thought and
his actions. By exploring unique aspects of Gregory's ascetic
theology, wherein the summit of Christian perfection is viewed in
terms of service to others, Demacopoulos argues that the very
aspects of Gregory's theology that made him distinctive were
precisely the factors that structured his responses to the
practical crises of his day. With a comprehensive understanding of
Christian history that resists the customary bifurcation between
Christian East and Christian West, Demacopoulos situates Gregory
within the broader movements of Christianity and the Roman world
that characterize the shift from late antiquity to the early Middle
Ages. This fresh reading of Gregory's extensive theological and
practical works underscores the novelty and nuance of Gregory as
thinker and bishop.
In late antiquity the rising number of ascetics who joined the
priesthood faced a pastoral dilemma. Should they follow a
traditional, demonstrably administrative, approach to pastoral
care, emphasizing doctrinal instruction, the care of the poor, and
the celebration of the sacraments? Or should they bring to the
parish the ascetic models of spiritual direction, characterized by
a more personal spiritual father/spiritual disciple relationship?
Five Models of Spiritual Direction in the Early Church explores the
struggles of five clerics (Athanasius, Gregory Nazianzen, Augustine
of Hippo, John Cassian, and Pope Gregory I) to reconcile their
ascetic idealism with the reality of pastoral responsibility.
Through a close reading of Greek and Latin texts, George E.
Demacopoulos explores each pastor's criteria for ordination, his
supervision of subordinate clergy, and his methods of spiritual
direction. He argues that the evolution in spiritual direction that
occurred during this period reflected and informed broader
developments in religious practices. Demacopoulos describes the way
in which these authors shaped the medieval pastoral traditions of
the East and the West. Each of the five struggled to balance the
tension between his ascetic idealism and the realities of the lay
church. Each offered distinct (and at times very different)
solutions to that tension. The diversity among their models of
spiritual direction demonstrates both the complexity of the problem
and the variable nature of early Christianity. Scholars and
students of late antiquity, the history of Christianity, and
historical theology will find a great deal of interest in Five
Models of Spiritual Direction in the Early Church. The book will
also appeal to those who are actively engaged in Christian
ministry.
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R367
R340
Discovery Miles 3 400
|