|
Showing 1 - 3 of
3 matches in All Departments
In this political history of twentieth-century Mexico, Gladys
McCormick argues that the key to understanding the immense power of
the long-ruling Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) is to be
found in the countryside. Using newly available sources, including
declassified secret police files and oral histories, McCormick
looks at large-scale sugar cooperatives in Morelos and Puebla, two
major agricultural regions that serve as microcosms of events
across the nation. She argues that Mexico's rural peoples, despite
shouldering much of the financial burden of modernization policies,
formed the PRI regime's most fervent base of support. McCormick
demonstrates how the PRI exploited this support, using key parts of
the countryside to test and refine instruments of control-including
the regulation of protest, manipulation of collective memories of
rural communities, and selective application of violence against
critics-that it later employed in other areas, both rural and
urban. With three peasant leaders, brothers named Ruben, Porfirio,
and Antonio Jaramillo, at the heart of her story, McCormick draws a
capacious picture of peasant activism, disillusion, and compromise
in state formation, revealing the basis for an enduring political
culture dominated by the PRI. On a broader level, McCormick
demonstrates the connections among modern state building in Latin
America, the consolidation of new forms of authoritarian rule, and
the deployment of violence on all sides.
In this political history of twentieth-century Mexico, Gladys
McCormick argues that the key to understanding the immense power of
the long-ruling Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) is to be
found in the countryside. Using newly available sources, including
declassified secret police files and oral histories, McCormick
looks at large-scale sugar cooperatives in Morelos and Puebla, two
major agricultural regions that serve as microcosms of events
across the nation. She argues that Mexico's rural peoples, despite
shouldering much of the financial burden of modernization policies,
formed the PRI regime's most fervent base of support. McCormick
demonstrates how the PRI exploited this support, using key parts of
the countryside to test and refine instruments of control-including
the regulation of protest, manipulation of collective memories of
rural communities, and selective application of violence against
critics-that it later employed in other areas, both rural and
urban. With three peasant leaders, brothers named Ruben, Porfirio,
and Antonio Jaramillo, at the heart of her story, McCormick draws a
capacious picture of peasant activism, disillusion, and compromise
in state formation, revealing the basis for an enduring political
culture dominated by the PRI. On a broader level, McCormick
demonstrates the connections among modern state building in Latin
America, the consolidation of new forms of authoritarian rule, and
the deployment of violence on all sides.
Decolonizing Native Histories is an interdisciplinary collection
that grapples with the racial and ethnic politics of knowledge
production and indigenous activism in the Americas. It analyzes the
relationship of language to power and empowerment, and advocates
for collaborations between community members, scholars, and
activists that prioritize the rights of Native peoples to decide
how their knowledge is used. The contributors-academics and
activists, indigenous and nonindigenous, from disciplines including
history, anthropology, linguistics, and political science-explore
the challenges of decolonization. These wide-ranging case studies
consider how language, the law, and the archive have historically
served as instruments of colonialism and how they can be creatively
transformed in constructing autonomy. The collection highlights
points of commonality and solidarity across geographical, cultural,
and linguistic boundaries and also reflects deep distinctions
between North and South. Decolonizing Native Histories looks at
Native histories and narratives in an internationally comparative
context, with the hope that international collaboration and
understanding of local histories will foster new possibilities for
indigenous mobilization and an increasingly decolonized future.
|
|