|
Showing 1 - 20 of
20 matches in All Departments
Ian Thomas Patrick was born on May 3, 1924, in Dennistoun, Glasgow.
His father was a senior member of staff in the Glasgow Corporation
Rates Department. Before his parents were married, his mother also
worked there. When Ian was four, the family bought a semidetached
house in Kelvindale, a new estate in the west end of Glasgow. He
and his younger sister attended Hillhead High School until war
broke out in 1939, when they both became evacuees. Ian was resident
in the hostel attached to Dumfries Academy. He spent two happy
years there obtaining his Higher Leaving Certificate in 1941. He
spent his sixth year back in Hillhead, then entered Glasgow
University Medical School, graduating in 1948. His parents were
churchgoers; Ian became a Sunday school teacher in his local
church, Westbourne Church of Scotland. His call to the mission
field developed over his student years. Two of his close
undergraduate friends had grown up as children of medical
missionaries, one in China and the other in Africa. He read several
books about missionary lives. During his final year as an
undergraduate, he volunteered to the Church of Scotland. He had
felt attracted to China, but the communists were spreading
throughout the country, and Christian missions were sending home
overseas staff. India seemed more possible. However, the only
vacancy was in the Punjab. Partition occurred in 1947, so a more
experienced candidate was needed. However, the Church of Scotland
referred him to the Presbyterian Church of England. After
graduation, Dr. Patrick's first job was to spend six months as
house surgeon in Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary. He applied
during this time and was interviewed and accepted to serve in
Rajshahi, the third-largest city in the new state of East Pakistan.
He was making plans for further posts to gain experience, but the
mission board instead arranged for him to spend his first year
training in the Welsh Mission Hospital in Shillong, the capital of
the hill state of Assam in India, under a very experienced
missionary, Arthur Hughes. After the first year, which included a
three-month Bengali language study course in Darjeeling, he began
work in September 1949 in Rajshahi, supervising the conversion of a
former student hostel into a hospital.
Ulysses S Grant, besides being the General-in-Chief of the Union
armies at the time of the Union victory in the American Civil War,
was also President, 1869-1878, at a time when the United States was
undergoing significant transformations, both economically and
strategically, and growing in confidence as a world power. At the
same time, Japan, following the Meiji Restoration of 1868, was
seeking to join the ranks of the developed, read exclusively
Western, states. This book explores the interaction of Grant with
Meiji Japan, compares and contrasts developments in the two
countries and assesses the impact each country had on the other. It
discusses the travels of the Iwakura Mission in the United States,
considers Grant's 1879 visit to Japan and examines the personal
relationship between Grant, the Meiji emperor and the other leaders
of the Meiji government. The book argues that Grant's thoughtful
consideration of the key issues of the day, issues common to many
countries at the time, and his suggested policy responses had a
huge impact on Meiji Japan.
Accessible and practical, Deconstructing Psychopathology provides a critical perspective on the institutions, practices, and presuppositions that underlie the study of psychopathology. The authors, who come from such areas as clinical psychology, psychiatric social work, psychoanalysis, and action research, challenge the traditions of the field in three ways: First, they analyze the notion of psychopathology as a conventional term in psychology and psychiatry, through the language and institutions that keep it in place. Next, they explore the deconstructive responses and resources and their implications for the theoretical practices that sustain clinical treatments. And finally, they offer an alternative way of seeing psychopathology along with practical models for critical professional work and good practice. This practical and well-written book will be an invaluable text for students and practitioners working to understand mental health.
Ulysses S Grant, besides being the General-in-Chief of the Union
armies at the time of the Union victory in the American Civil War,
was also President, 1869-1878, at a time when the United States was
undergoing significant transformations, both economically and
strategically, and growing in confidence as a world power. At the
same time, Japan, following the Meiji Restoration of 1868, was
seeking to join the ranks of the developed, read exclusively
Western, states. This book explores the interaction of Grant with
Meiji Japan, compares and contrasts developments in the two
countries and assesses the impact each country had on the other. It
discusses the travels of the Iwakura Mission in the United States,
considers Grant's 1879 visit to Japan and examines the personal
relationship between Grant, the Meiji emperor and the other leaders
of the Meiji government. The book argues that Grant's thoughtful
consideration of the key issues of the day, issues common to many
countries at the time, and his suggested policy responses had a
huge impact on Meiji Japan.
This practical book provides clear, step-by-step guidance on how to
develop a monitoring and evaluation framework in a participatory,
logical, systematic, and integrated way. The authors outline the
key stages and steps involved, including: scoping the framework;
identifying planned results; using program theory and program
logic; developing evaluation questions; identifying processes for
ongoing data collection and analysis; determining means to promote
learning; reporting; and dissemination of results. A final chapter
focuses on planning for implementation of the framework, with
reference to the broader program and organizational context. The
authors draw on their extensive experience in developing monitoring
and evaluation frameworks to provide examples of good practice that
inform organizational learning and decision making, while offering
tips and guidelines that can be used to address common pitfalls.
Ian Thomas Patrick was born on May 3, 1924, in Dennistoun, Glasgow.
His father was a senior member of staff in the Glasgow Corporation
Rates Department. Before his parents were married, his mother also
worked there. When Ian was four, the family bought a semidetached
house in Kelvindale, a new estate in the west end of Glasgow. He
and his younger sister attended Hillhead High School until war
broke out in 1939, when they both became evacuees. Ian was resident
in the hostel attached to Dumfries Academy. He spent two happy
years there obtaining his Higher Leaving Certificate in 1941. He
spent his sixth year back in Hillhead, then entered Glasgow
University Medical School, graduating in 1948. His parents were
churchgoers; Ian became a Sunday school teacher in his local
church, Westbourne Church of Scotland. His call to the mission
field developed over his student years. Two of his close
undergraduate friends had grown up as children of medical
missionaries, one in China and the other in Africa. He read several
books about missionary lives. During his final year as an
undergraduate, he volunteered to the Church of Scotland. He had
felt attracted to China, but the communists were spreading
throughout the country, and Christian missions were sending home
overseas staff. India seemed more possible. However, the only
vacancy was in the Punjab. Partition occurred in 1947, so a more
experienced candidate was needed. However, the Church of Scotland
referred him to the Presbyterian Church of England. After
graduation, Dr. Patrick's first job was to spend six months as
house surgeon in Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary. He applied
during this time and was interviewed and accepted to serve in
Rajshahi, the third-largest city in the new state of East Pakistan.
He was making plans for further posts to gain experience, but the
mission board instead arranged for him to spend his first year
training in the Welsh Mission Hospital in Shillong, the capital of
the hill state of Assam in India, under a very experienced
missionary, Arthur Hughes. After the first year, which included a
three-month Bengali language study course in Darjeeling, he began
work in September 1949 in Rajshahi, supervising the conversion of a
former student hostel into a hospital.
`I enjoyed this book, and think that it should find a grateful and
attentive readership in the practical field as well as being a
central text in academic settings. It will also be well received by
those, like myself, for whom the interest is more in deconstructing
than psychotherapy' - Dialogues This book takes the discursive and
postmodern turn in psychotherapy a significant step forward and
will be of interest to all those working in mental health who are
concerned with challenges to oppression and processes of
emancipation. It achieves this by: reflecting on the role of
psychotherapy in contemporary culture; developing critiques of
language in psychotherapy that unravel its claims to personal
truth; and the reworking of a place in the transformative
therapeutic practice. Deconstruction is brought to bear on the key
conceptual and pragmatic issues that therapists and clinical
psychologists face, and the project of therapy is opened up to
critical attention and reconstruction. The book provides clear
reviews of different viewpoints and will help readers to understand
the complex terrain of debates.
The language of psychoanalysis has irrevocably shaped 20th Century culture in countless ways. In this major book, Ian Parker provides a fascinating and accessible overview of the place of this extraordinary intellectual movement in our culture today. Parker systematically reviews the key psychoanalytic theories while exploring throughout their significance to modern life. Freud and object relations theory is directed toward group processes, religion, and war; the Frankfurt School is used to examine modern individuality, authoritarianism and changes in culture, and the Lacanian tradition to account for language, representation and self-improvement. The theoretical analysis incorporates throughout the work of key figures ranging from Adorno, Habermas, and Fromm to Klein, Kristeva, Winnicott, and Zizek. Psychoanalytic Culture is a magnificent exploration of themes that lie at the heart of contemporary society. It will be essential reading for students and academics in psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, psychology, sociology and cultural studies.
Accessible and practical, Deconstructing Psychopathology provides a critical perspective on the institutions, practices, and presuppositions that underlie the study of psychopathology. The authors, who come from such areas as clinical psychology, psychiatric social work, psychoanalysis, and action research, challenge the traditions of the field in three ways: First, they analyze the notion of psychopathology as a conventional term in psychology and psychiatry, through the language and institutions that keep it in place. Next, they explore the deconstructive responses and resources and their implications for the theoretical practices that sustain clinical treatments. And finally, they offer an alternative way of seeing psychopathology along with practical models for critical professional work and good practice. This practical and well-written book will be an invaluable text for students and practitioners working to understand mental health.
This book charts a clear and accessible path through some of the
key debates in contemporary psychology. Drawing upon the wider
critical and discursive turn in the human sciences, Social
Constructionism, Discourse and Realism explores comprehensively the
many claims about what we can know of `reality' in social
constructionist and discursive research in psychology. Relativist
versus realist tensions go to the heart of current theoretical and
methodological issues, not only within psychology but across the
social and human sciences. By mapping the connections between
theory, method and politics in social research and placing these
within the context of the broader social constructionist and
discursive debates, the internationally renowned contributors offer
the reader an invaluable survey of the debates.
|
|