|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
What is the number one? Does 2 plus 2 always equal 4? These
seemingly simple questions have perplexed philosophers for eons,
but the ideas of German philosopher Gottlob Frege (1848-1925)
transformed the discussion. Frege believed that the truths of
arithmetic and of all mathematics are derived from self-evident
logical truths. His new way of looking at logic and mathematics was
influential and his convictions revolutionized logic and laid the
foundation for modern analytic philosophy. Joan Weiner presents an
accurate, accessible explanation of Frege's ideas, tracing the
development of his thought and making the essential concepts
understandable.
Frege is widely regarded as having set much of the agenda of
contemporary analytic philosophy. As standardly read, he meant to
introduce-and make crucial contributions to-the project of giving
an account of the workings of (an improved version of) natural
language. Yet, despite the great admiration most contemporary
philosophers feel for Frege, it is widely believed that he
committed a large number of serious, and inexplicable, blunders.
For, if Frege really meant to be constructing a theory of the
workings of (some version of) natural language, then a significant
number of his stated views-including views that he claimed to be
central to his philosophical picture-are straightforwardly wrong.
But did Frege mean to be giving an account of the workings of
language? He himself never actually claimed to be doing this, and,
indeed, never even described such a project. Taking Frege at his
Word offers an interpretation that is based on a different approach
to his writings. Rather than using the contributions he is taken to
have made to contemporary work in the philosophy of language to
infer what his projects were, Joan Weiner gives priority to Frege's
own accounts of what he means to be doing. She provides a very
different view of Frege's project. One might suspect that, on such
a reading, Frege's writings would have purely antiquarian interest,
but this would be a mistake. The final two chapters show that Frege
offers us new ways of addressing some of the philosophical problems
that worry us today.
Not only can the influence of Gottlob Frege (1848-1925) be found in
contemporary work in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, and the
philosophy of language, but his projects-and the very terminology
he employed in pursuing those projects-are still current in
contemporary philosophy. This is undoubtedly why it seems so
reasonable to assume that we can read Frege' s writings as if he
were one of us, speaking to our philosophical concerns in our
language. In Joan Weiner's view, however, Frege's words can be
accurately interpreted only if we set that assumption aside. Weiner
here offers a challenging new approach to the philosophy of this
central figure in analytic philosophy. Weiner finds in Frege's
corpus, from Begriffsschrift (1879) on, a unified project of
remarkable ambition to which each of the writings in that corpus
makes a distinct contribution-a project whose motivation she brings
to life through a careful reading of his Foundations of Arithmetic.
The Frege that Weiner brings into clear view is very different from
the familiar figure. Far from having originated one of the standard
positions on the nature of reference, Frege turns out not to have
had positive doctrines on anything like what contemporary
philosophers mean by "reference." Far from having served as a
standard-bearer for those who take the realists' side of
contemporary disputes with anti-realists, Frege turns out to have
had no stake in either side of the controversy. Through Weiner's
lens, Frege emerges as a thinker who has principled reasons for
challenging the very assumptions and motivations that animate
philosophers to dispute these doctrines. This lucidly written and
accessible book will generate controversy among all readers with an
interest in epistemology, philosophy of language, history of
philosophy, and the philosophy of mathematics.
|
|