|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
The Classical Greek sophists – Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus,
Hippias, and Antiphon, among others – are some of the most
important figures in the flourishing of linguistic, historical, and
philosophical reflection at the time of Socrates. They are also
some of the most controversial: what makes the sophists
distinctive, and what they contributed to fifth-century
intellectual culture, has been hotly debated since the time of
Plato. They have often been derided as reactionaries, relativists
or cynically superficial thinkers, or as mere opportunists, making
money from wealthy democrats eager for public repute. This volume
takes a fresh perspective on the sophists – who really counted as
one; how distinctive they were; and what kind of sense later
thinkers made of them. In three sections, contributors address the
sophists' predecessors and historical and professional context;
their major intellectual themes, including language, ethics,
society, and religion; and their reception from the fourth century
BCE to modernity.
The Classical Greek sophists – Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus,
Hippias, and Antiphon, among others – are some of the most
important figures in the flourishing of linguistic, historical, and
philosophical reflection at the time of Socrates. They are also
some of the most controversial: what makes the sophists
distinctive, and what they contributed to fifth-century
intellectual culture, has been hotly debated since the time of
Plato. They have often been derided as reactionaries, relativists
or cynically superficial thinkers, or as mere opportunists, making
money from wealthy democrats eager for public repute. This volume
takes a fresh perspective on the sophists – who really counted as
one; how distinctive they were; and what kind of sense later
thinkers made of them. In three sections, contributors address the
sophists' predecessors and historical and professional context;
their major intellectual themes, including language, ethics,
society, and religion; and their reception from the fourth century
BCE to modernity.
A bold new reconception of ancient Greek drama as a mode of
philosophical thinking The Philosophical Stage offers an innovative
approach to ancient Greek literature and thought that places drama
at the heart of intellectual history. Drawing on evidence from
tragedy and comedy, Joshua Billings shines new light on the
development of early Greek philosophy, arguing that drama is our
best source for understanding the intellectual culture of classical
Athens. In this incisive book, Billings recasts classical Greek
intellectual history as a conversation across discourses and
demonstrates the significance of dramatic reflections on widely
shared theoretical questions. He argues that neither "literature"
nor "philosophy" was a defined category in the fifth century BCE,
and develops a method of reading dramatic form as a structured
investigation of issues at the heart of the emerging discipline of
philosophy. A breathtaking work of intellectual history by one of
today's most original classical scholars, The Philosophical Stage
presents a novel approach to ancient drama and sets a path for a
renewed understanding of early Greek thought.
Why did Greek tragedy and "the tragic" come to be seen as essential
to conceptions of modernity? And how has this belief affected
modern understandings of Greek drama? In Genealogy of the Tragic,
Joshua Billings answers these and related questions by tracing the
emergence of the modern theory of the tragic, which was first
developed around 1800 by thinkers associated with German Idealism.
The book argues that the idea of the tragic arose in response to a
new consciousness of history in the late eighteenth century, which
spurred theorists to see Greek tragedy as both a unique,
historically remote form and a timeless literary genre full of
meaning for the present. The book offers a new interpretation of
the theories of Schiller, Schelling, Hegel, Holderlin, and others,
as mediations between these historicizing and universalizing
impulses, and shows the roots of their approaches in earlier
discussions of Greek tragedy in Germany, France, and England. By
examining eighteenth-century readings of tragedy and the
interactions between idealist thinkers in detail, Genealogy of the
Tragic offers the most comprehensive historical account of the
tragic to date, as well as the fullest explanation of why and how
the idea was used to make sense of modernity. The book argues that
idealist theories remain fundamental to contemporary
interpretations of Greek tragedy, and calls for a renewed
engagement with philosophical questions in criticism of tragedy.
Why did Greek tragedy and "the tragic" come to be seen as
essential to conceptions of modernity? And how has this belief
affected modern understandings of Greek drama? In "Genealogy of the
Tragic," Joshua Billings answers these and related questions by
tracing the emergence of the modern theory of the tragic, which was
first developed around 1800 by thinkers associated with German
Idealism. The book argues that the idea of the tragic arose in
response to a new consciousness of history in the late eighteenth
century, which spurred theorists to see Greek tragedy as both a
unique, historically remote form and a timeless literary genre full
of meaning for the present. The book offers a new interpretation of
the theories of Schiller, Schelling, Hegel, Holderlin, and others,
as mediations between these historicizing and universalizing
impulses, and shows the roots of their approaches in earlier
discussions of Greek tragedy in Germany, France, and England. By
examining eighteenth-century readings of tragedy and the
interactions between idealist thinkers in detail, "Genealogy of the
Tragic" offers the most comprehensive historical account of the
tragic to date, as well as the fullest explanation of why and how
the idea was used to make sense of modernity. The book argues that
idealist theories remain fundamental to contemporary
interpretations of Greek tragedy, and calls for a renewed
engagement with philosophical questions in criticism of
tragedy."
|
|