|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
Aristotle labors under no illusion that in the practical sphere
humans operate according to the canons of logic. This does not
prevent him, however, from bringing his own logical acumen to his
study of human behavior. Aristotle, according to Fr. Flannery,
depicts the way in which human acts of various sorts and in various
combinations determine the logical structure of moral character.
Some moral characters - or character types - manage to incorporate
a high degree of practical consistency; others incorporate less,
without forfeiting their basic orientation towards the good. Still
others approach utter inconsistency or moral deprivation, although
even these, in so far as they are responsible for their actions,
retain a core element of rationality in their souls. According to
Aristotle, moral character depends ultimately upon the structure of
individual acts and upon how they fit together into a whole that is
consistent - or not consistent - with justice and friendship. This
book will appeal to professional scholars and graduate students
with an interest in Aristotle's ethics and in ethics generally. It
proposes comprehensive interpretations of some difficult passages
in Aristotle's two major ethical works ( the Nicomachean Ethics and
the Eudemian Ethics ). It brings to bear upon the analysis of human
behavior passages in Aristotle's logical works and in his Physics.
It also draws connections among areas of particular interest to
contemporary ethics: action theory, the analysis of practical
reason, and virtue ethics.
Alexander of Aphrodisias, who flourished c. 200AD, was the leading
Peripatetic philosopher of his age. Most of his philosophical
energies were spent in commenting upon Aristotle: his commentary on
the Prior Analytics remains one of the most thorough and helpful
guides to this difficult work; in addition, the commentary
preserves invaluable information about various aspects of Stoic
logic, and it also presents a picture of categorical syllogistic at
a turning point in its historical development. This volume contains
a translation of the first third of the commentary - the part
dealing with non-modal syllogistic. The translation is preceded by
a substantial introduction which discusses Alexander's place in the
commentatorial tradition and his use of logical terminology. The
book is completed by a translation of the pertinent part of the
Prior Analytics, a summary account of categorical syllogistic, and
a set of indexes.
|
|