|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
Leo Strauss and his students have long been accused of mendacity,
elitism, and militarism, but the Iraq War has prompted
unprecedented levels of caustic and inaccurate denunciations.
Inappropriate criticisms have issued from artists (Tim Robbins),
politicians (Ron Paul), journalists (Joe Klein), and even highly
lauded scholars such as Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Gordon Wood,
Douglas Massey, Stephen Holmes, Anne Norton, Shadia Drury, Sheldon
Wolin, John Pocock, John Yolton, Nicholas Xenos, and Brian Leiter.
In Straussophobia, Peter Minowitz provides a methodical and
detailed critique of the major offenders, especially of Drury, who
maintains that Strauss established a "covert tyranny" that would
keep the Western world "mired in perpetual war." In replying to
such charges and to various authors who belittle Strauss's
contributions as a scholar Minowitz highlights the imaginative yet
meticulous manner in which Strauss interpreted Thucydides, Plato,
Xenophon, Farabi, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, and Carl Schmitt.
Straussophobia also provides both a comprehensive assessment of
Strauss's 1933 letter that commended "fascist, authoritarian, and
imperial" principles, and a compelling account of Strauss's
influence, or lack of influence, on neoconservative promoters of
the Iraq War (e.g., Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Lewis
Libby). The book likewise breaks new ground in employing diversity
discourse to explain and combat the bigotry and buffoonery that
pervade attacks against Strauss and Straussians and in drawing on
Strauss to illuminate the distortions that mar some widely-used
arguments for affirmative action.
In launching modern economics, Adam Smith paved the way for
laissez-faire capitalism, Marxism, and contemporary social science.
This book scrutinizes Smith's disparagement of politics and
religion to illuminate the subtlety of his rhetoric, the depth of
his thought, and the ultimate shortcomings of his project.
Leo Strauss and his students have long been accused of mendacity,
elitism, and militarism, but the Iraq War has prompted
unprecedented levels of caustic and inaccurate denunciations.
Inappropriate criticisms have issued from artists (Tim Robbins),
politicians (Ron Paul), journalists (Joe Klein), and even highly
lauded scholars such as Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Gordon Wood,
Douglas Massey, Stephen Holmes, Anne Norton, Shadia Drury, Sheldon
Wolin, John Pocock, John Yolton, Nicholas Xenos, and Brian Leiter.
In Straussophobia, Peter Minowitz provides a methodical and
detailed critique of the major offenders, especially of Drury, who
maintains that Strauss established a 'covert tyranny' that would
keep the Western world 'mired in perpetual war.' In replying to
such charges_and to various authors who belittle Strauss's
contributions as a scholar_Minowitz highlights the imaginative yet
meticulous manner in which Strauss interpreted Thucydides, Plato,
Xenophon, Farabi, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, and Carl Schmitt.
Straussophobia also provides both a comprehensive assessment of
Strauss's 1933 letter that commended 'fascist, authoritarian, and
imperial' principles, and a compelling account of Strauss's
influence, or lack of influence, on neoconservative promoters of
the Iraq War (e.g., Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Lewis
Libby). The book likewise breaks new ground in employing diversity
discourse to explain and combat the bigotry and buffoonery that
pervade attacks against Strauss and Straussians_and in drawing on
Strauss to illuminate the distortions that mar some widely-used
arguments for affirmative action.
A New Politics for Philosophy: Essays on Plato, Nietzsche, and
Strauss presents meticulous readings of key philosophical works of
towering figures from both the classical and modern intellectual
traditions: Protagoras, Aeschylus, Xenophon, Plato, Descartes,
Nietzsche, and Leo Strauss. Inspired by the scholarship of Laurence
Lampert, the international group of scholars explore questions of
the nature or identity of the philosopher, with an emphasis on
painstaking exegesis informed by close attention to detail. The
chapters touch on topics ranging from Plato's Charmides, Aeschylus'
Prometheia Trilogy, Xenophon's Hiero or Tyrannicus, Nietzsche's
Thus Spoke Zarathustra and Ecce Homo, Nietzsche's Plato, whether
Nietzsche thought of himself as a modern-day Socrates, philosophy's
relationship to science, the function of the noontide image in the
center of Part IV of Nietzsche's Zarathustra, a re-evaluation of
the young Nietzsche's break from the spell of Schopenhauer, the
dramatic date of the conversation presented in Plato's Republic,
Xenophon's dialogical investigation of the troubled tyrant's soul,
Leo Stauss's furtive discussion of Descartes and the modern
aspiration to master nature, and Nietzschean environmentalism. The
book also includes an interview with Laurence Lampert.
|
|