|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
Drawing on insights from work in medical history and sociology,
this book analyzes changing meanings of personalized medicine over
time, from the rise of biomedicine in the twentieth century, to the
emergence of pharmacogenomics and personal genomics in the 1990s
and 2000s. In the past when doctors championed personalization they
did so to emphasize that patients had unique biographies and social
experiences in the name of caring for their patients as
individuals. However, since the middle of the twentieth century,
geneticists have successfully promoted the belief that genes are
implicated in why some people develop diseases and why some have
adverse reactions to drugs when others do not. In doing so, they
claim to offer a new way of personalizing the prediction,
prevention and treatment of disease. As this book shows, the
genomic reimagining of personalized medicine centres on new forms
of capitalization and consumption of genetic information. While
genomics promises the ultimate individualization of medicine, the
author argues that personalized medicine exists in the imaginative
gap between the problems and limits of current scientific practices
and future prospects to individualize medical interventions. A
rigorous, critical examination of the promises of genomics to
transform the economics and delivery of medicine, Genomics and the
Reimagining of Personalized Medicine examines the consequences of
the shift towards personalization for the way we think about and
act on health and disease in society. As such, it will be of
interest to scholars and students of the sociology of medicine and
health, science and technology studies, and health policy.
Over the past few years there has been a proliferation of genetic
databases and biobanks, which promise to increase scientists'
understandings of the way our genes interact with the environment.
These biomedical research projects involve hundreds of thousands of
people worldwide who are asked to donate blood and tissue samples
as well as personal information. The control, exploitation and
ownership of such detailed personal medical information by
governments and by commercial companies is generating social and
ethical controversy. contradictions and limitations of the current
regulatory frameworks for and policy debates about genetic
databases. Drawing on original empirical research and theoretical
debates in the fields of sociology, anthropology and legal studies,
the contributors to this book challenge the prevailing orthodoxy of
informed consent and explore the relationship between personal
privacy and the public good. They also consider the multiple
meanings attached to human tissue and the role of public
consultations and commercial involvement in the creation and use of
genetic databases. representation of participation that is often at
odds with the experiences and understandings of those taking part.
The findings present a serious challenge for public policy to
provide mechanisms to safeguard the welfare of individuals
participating in genetic databases. The book is written in an
accessible style that will appeal to a multidisciplinary and
international audience, and is relevant to policy discussions in
Europe and in North America, as well as other countries that are
developing similar initiatives. It will be of great interest to
academics and students of medical sociology, health studies, public
health, public policy and ethics.
Over the past few years there has been a proliferation of genetic
databases and biobanks, which promise to increase scientists'
understandings of the way our genes interact with the environment.
These biomedical research projects involve hundreds of thousands of
people worldwide who are asked to donate blood and tissue samples
as well as personal information. The control, exploitation and
ownership of such detailed personal medical information by
governments and by commercial companies is generating social and
ethical controversy. Genetic Databases offers a timely analysis of
the underlying tensions, contradictions and limitations of the
current regulatory frameworks for and policy debates about genetic
databases. Drawing on original empirical research and theoretical
debates in the fields of sociology, anthropology and legal studies,
the contributors to this book challenge the prevailing orthodoxy of
informed consent and explore the relationship between personal
privacy and the public good. They also consider the multiple
meanings attached to human tissue and the role of public
consultations and commercial involvement in the creation and use of
genetic databases. The authors argue
Drawing on insights from work in medical history and sociology,
this book analyzes changing meanings of personalized medicine over
time, from the rise of biomedicine in the twentieth century, to the
emergence of pharmacogenomics and personal genomics in the 1990s
and 2000s. In the past when doctors championed personalization they
did so to emphasize that patients had unique biographies and social
experiences in the name of caring for their patients as
individuals. However, since the middle of the twentieth century,
geneticists have successfully promoted the belief that genes are
implicated in why some people develop diseases and why some have
adverse reactions to drugs when others do not. In doing so, they
claim to offer a new way of personalizing the prediction,
prevention and treatment of disease. As this book shows, the
genomic reimagining of personalized medicine centres on new forms
of capitalization and consumption of genetic information. While
genomics promises the ultimate individualization of medicine, the
author argues that personalized medicine exists in the imaginative
gap between the problems and limits of current scientific practices
and future prospects to individualize medical interventions. A
rigorous, critical examination of the promises of genomics to
transform the economics and delivery of medicine, Genomics and the
Reimagining of Personalized Medicine examines the consequences of
the shift towards personalization for the way we think about and
act on health and disease in society. As such, it will be of
interest to scholars and students of the sociology of medicine and
health, science and technology studies, and health policy.
|
|