|
Showing 1 - 8 of
8 matches in All Departments
In the past decade the Asia-Pacific region has become a focus of
international politics and military strategies. Due to China's
rising economic and military strength, North Korea's nuclear tests
and missile launches, tense international disputes over small
island groups in the seas around Asia, and the United States
pivoting a majority of its military forces to the region, the
islands of the western Pacific have increasingly become the center
of global attention. While the Pacific is a cur- rent hotbed of
geopolitical rivalry and intense militarization, the region is also
something else: a homeland to the hundreds of millions of people
that inhabit it.
Based on a decade of research in the region, "The Empires' Edge"
examines the tremendous damage the militarization of the Pacific
has wrought on its people and environments. Furthermore, Davis
details how contemporary social movements in this region are
affecting global geopolitics by challenging the military use of
Pacific islands and by developing a demilitarized view of security
based on affinity, mutual aid, and international solidarity.
Through an examination of "sacrificed" is- lands from across the
region--including Bikini Atoll, Okinawa, Hawai'i, and Guam--"The
Empires' Edge" makes the case that the great political contest of
the twenty-first century is not about which country gets hegemony
in a global system but rather about the choice be- tween
perpetuating a system of international relations based on
domination or pursuing a more egalitarian and cooperative future.
Sovereignty is a term used by stateless people seeking
decolonization as well as by dominant social groups struggling to
reassert their socially privileged positions. All sorts of
political actors, it seems, are interested in sovereignty. It is
less clear, however, just what the term means, and whether calls
for sovereignty promote a politically progressive or conservative
agenda. Examining how sovereignty functions allows us to better
understand the dangers, promise, and limitations of relying on it
as a political strategy. Islands and Oceans explores how struggles
for decolonization, self- determination, and political rights
permeate conceptualizations of how sovereignty operates. To support
his theoretical claims, Sasha Davis works through a series of case
studies, drawing on research that he conducted between 2013 and
2017 in Korea, Guam, Yap, Palau, the Northern Marianas, Hawai'i,
and Honshu and Okinawa in Japan. Because of the hybridized and
contested arrangements of sovereignty in these territories, these
places are excellent sites to tease out some of the differences
between official regimes of sovereignty and the actual control of
social processes on the ground. In addition, analysis of the
tensions and acute debates over sovereignty in these regions lays
bare how sovereignty works as a process. Davis's study of these
political cases within the Asia-Pacific region advances our
understanding the nature of sovereignty more generally.
Sovereignty is a term used by stateless people seeking
decolonization as well as by dominant social groups struggling to
reassert their socially privileged positions. All sorts of
political actors, it seems, are interested in sovereignty. It is
less clear, however, just what the term means, and whether calls
for sovereignty promote a politically progressive or conservative
agenda. Examining how sovereignty functions allows us to better
understand the dangers, promise, and limitations of relying on it
as a political strategy. Islands and Oceans explores how struggles
for decolonization, self- determination, and political rights
permeate conceptualizations of how sovereignty operates. To support
his theoretical claims, Sasha Davis works through a series of case
studies, drawing on research that he conducted between 2013 and
2017 in Korea, Guam, Yap, Palau, the Northern Marianas, Hawai'i,
and Honshu and Okinawa in Japan. Because of the hybridized and
contested arrangements of sovereignty in these territories, these
places are excellent sites to tease out some of the differences
between official regimes of sovereignty and the actual control of
social processes on the ground. In addition, analysis of the
tensions and acute debates over sovereignty in these regions lays
bare how sovereignty works as a process. Davis's study of these
political cases within the Asia-Pacific region advances our
understanding the nature of sovereignty more generally.
|
|