|
Showing 1 - 8 of
8 matches in All Departments
Less than a year after the assassination of President Kennedy
brought Lyndon B. Johnson to the White House, Harold Wilson became
British Prime Minister. Over the next four years, the two men
governed their countries through unprecedented crises, both
domestic and international. To provide a better understanding of
the transatlantic relationship, this volume provides for the first
time all the correspondence between Wilson and Johnson from the
time Wilson became Prime Minister in October 1964 until Johnson
stepped down as President in January 1969. This period witnessed
Britain's accelerated 'retreat from Empire' and the United States'
correspondingly active role in confronting communist influence
across the globe. The letters between Wilson and Johnson reveal the
difficulties they faced during this period of transition. In
particular, the issue of the Vietnam War looms large, as Wilson's
refusal to commit British forces, and his sponsorship of peace
initiatives, served to place severe strain on relations between the
two men. Other significant topics which re-occur in the
correspondence include American attempts to stiffen Britain's
resolve to preserve the value of the pound, the almost continual
British defence reviews, the future of the British Army on the
Rhine, the French withdrawal from NATO, the 1967 Arab-Israeli War,
East-West relations, Britain's relations with the EEC, the Prague
Spring, and the devaluation of sterling. Drawing on material from
the Johnson Presidential Library, Wilson's private papers at the
Bodleian Library, and the National Archives of both the United
States and the United Kingdom, this collection provides a direct
insight into Anglo-American relations at a pivotal moment. For
whilst the United States was undoubtedly a superpower on the rise
and Britain a declining influence on the world stage, the letters
reveal that Johnson was eager for international allies to
demonstrate to the American people that the US did not stan
This book is a major and wide-ranging re-assessment of
Anglo-American relations in the Middle Eastern context. It analyses
the process of ending of empire in the Middle East from 1945 to the
Yom Kippur War of 1973. Based on original research into both
British and American archival sources, it covers all the key events
of the period, including the withdrawal from Palestine, the
Anglo-American coup against the Musaddiq regime in Iran, the Suez
Crisis and its aftermath, the Iraqi and Yemeni revolutions, and the
Arab-Israeli conflicts. It demonstrates that, far from experiencing
a 'loss of nerve' or tamely acquiescing in a transfer of power to
the United States, British decision-makers robustly defended their
regional interests well into the 1960s and even beyond. It also
argues that concept of the 'special relationship' impeded the
smooth-running of Anglo-American relations in the region by
obscuring differences, stymieing clear communication, and
practising self-deception on policy-makers on both sides of the
Atlantic who assumed a contiguity which all too often failed to
exist. With the Middle East at the top of the contemporary
international policy agenda, and recent Anglo-American
interventions fuelling interest in empire, this is a timely book of
importance to all those interested in the contemporary development
of the region.
Britain's relationship with the Gulf region remains one of the few
unexplored episodes in the study of British decolonization. The
decision, announced in 1968, to leave the Gulf within three years
represented an explicit recognition by Britain that its 'East of
Suez' role was at an end. This book examines the decision-making
process which underpinned this reversal and considers the
interaction between British decision-making, and local responses
and initiatives, in shaping the modern Gulf. Using sources
previously unavailable to scholars, Britain's Revival and Fall in
the Gulf is a valuable addition to the studies on the modern Gulf.
This book is a major and wide-ranging re-assessment of
Anglo-American relations in the Middle Eastern context. It analyses
the process of ending of empire in the Middle East from 1945 to the
Yom Kippur War of 1973. Based on original research into both
British and American archival sources, it covers all the key events
of the period, including the withdrawal from Palestine, the
Anglo-American coup against the Musaddiq regime in Iran, the Suez
Crisis and its aftermath, the Iraqi and Yemeni revolutions, and the
Arab-Israeli conflicts. It demonstrates that, far from experiencing
a 'loss of nerve' or tamely acquiescing in a transfer of power to
the United States, British decision-makers robustly defended their
regional interests well into the 1960s and even beyond. It also
argues that concept of the 'special relationship' impeded the
smooth-running of Anglo-American relations in the region by
obscuring differences, stymieing clear communication, and
practising self-deception on policy-makers on both sides of the
Atlantic who assumed a contiguity which all too often failed to
exist. With the Middle East at the top of the contemporary
international policy agenda, and recent Anglo-American
interventions fuelling interest in empire, this is a timely book of
importance to all those interested in the contemporary development
of the region.
The nationalization of the Suez Canal in 1956 triggered one of the
gravest international crises since the Second World War. The
fiftieth anniversary of the Suez crisis in 2006 presented an ideal
opportunity to re-visit and reassess this seminal episode in
post-war history. Although much has been written on Suez, this
study provides fresh perspectives by reflecting the latest research
from leading international authorities on the crisis and its
aftermath. By drawing on recently released documents, by including
previously neglected aspects of Suez, and by reassessing its more
familiar ones, the volume makes a key contribution to furthering
research on - and understanding of - the crisis. The volume
explores the origins of the crisis, the crisis itself and the
aftermath all from a broad perspective. An introduction by the
editor presents the current state of the historiography and
provides an overview of the debates surrounding the crisis, while
the conclusion by Scott Lucas not merely draws the themes of the
book together, but also explores the crisis in its regional and
international context. Within the overall context of focussing on
the international and military aspects of the crisis, it is an
explicit intention to embody in the contributions the multifaceted
nature of Suez. Although Britain, as in many ways the principal
actor, is strongly represented, there are also highly original
chapters on both the regional and international dimensions to the
crisis, and crucially the interaction between the two. As well as
exploring the role of the main protagonists, essays also deal with
American, Jordanian and Turkish reactions to the invasion. The
overall result is an innovative, thought-provoking, and
wide-ranging reassessment of Suez and its aftermath, which at a
time when the Middle East once again holds the world's attention,
is particularly appropriate.
Britain's relationship with the Gulf region remains one of the few
unexplored episodes in the study of British decolonization. The
decision, announced in 1968, to leave the Gulf within three years
represented an explicit recognition by Britain that its 'East of
Suez' role was at an end. This book examines the decision-making
process which underpinned this reversal and considers the
interaction between British decision-making, and local responses
and initiatives, in shaping the modern Gulf. Using sources
previously unavailable to scholars, Britain's Revival and Fall in
the Gulf is a valuable addition to the studies on the modern Gulf.
Although Britain's formal imperial role in the smaller, oil-rich
Sheikhdoms of the Arab Gulf - Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the
United Arab Emirates - ended in 1971, Britain continued to have a
strong interest and continuing presence in the region. This book
explores the nature of Britain's role after the formal end of
empire. It traces the historical events of the post-imperial years,
including the 1973 oil shock, the fall of the Shah in Iran, and the
beginnings of the Iran-Iraq War; considers the changing positions
towards the region of other major world powers, including the
United States; and engages with debates on the nature of empire and
the end of empire. The book is a sequel to the author's highly
acclaimed previous books Britain's Revival and Fall in the Gulf:
Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the Trucial States, 1950-71 (Routledge
2004) and Ending Empire in the Middle East: Britain, the United
States and Post-war Decolonization, 1945-1973 (Routledge 2012).
Cambridge Perspectives in History provides a range of textbooks and
advanced history courses, focusing on key periods and themes in
British and European history.
|
|