This book presents a selection of revised and updated papers presented in September 2018 at the International Conference 'Rethinking the Crime of Aggression: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives', which was held in Marburg, Germany, and hosted by the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials (ICWC). In light of the activation of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court concerning the crime of aggression, international experts from various disciplines such as law, history, the social sciences, psychology and economics came together to enhance the understanding of this complex and challenging matter and thereby opened a cross-disciplinary dialogue regarding aggressive war and the crime of aggression: a dialogue that not only addresses the historical genesis of the current situation, the content of the new aggression provisions, their implementation in practice and their possible regulatory effects, but also instigates perspectives for investigating future developments and issues. Stefanie Bock is Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law and Comparative Law in the Department of Law at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials. Eckart Conze is Professor of Modern and Contemporary History in the Department of History at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials.

This book presents a selection of revised and updated papers presented in September 2018 at the International Conference 'Rethinking the Crime of Aggression: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives', which was held in Marburg, Germany, and hosted by the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials (ICWC). In light of the activation of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court concerning the crime of aggression, international experts from various disciplines such as law, history, the social sciences, psychology and economics came together to enhance the understanding of this complex and challenging matter and thereby opened a cross-disciplinary dialogue regarding aggressive war and the crime of aggression: a dialogue that not only addresses the historical genesis of the current situation, the content of the new aggression provisions, their implementation in practice and their possible regulatory effects, but also instigates perspectives for investigating future developments and issues. Stefanie Bock is Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law and Comparative Law in the Department of Law at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials. Eckart Conze is Professor of Modern and Contemporary History in the Department of History at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials.

"Dr. Johns from CERN and his team search for the beginning of the universe by means of a huge simulation.
Is it possible to eliminate God as creator? If this could be proved doubtlessly, all religious quarrels would be ended and the world would be a more peaceful place.
But what if we are alone indeed and faith would be just a small comfort?"

Born out of severe doubts in God's mere existence this story helped the author to decide whether he should give faith yet another chance.

"Dr. Johns vom CERN und sein Team suchen mit Hilfe einer gewaltigen Simulation nach den Anfangen unseres Universums.
Kann Gott als Schopfer ausgeschlossen werden? Konnte man dies zweifelsfrei beweisen, waren alle religiosen Streitereien beendet, und die Welt ware ein friedlicherer Ort.
Was aber, wenn wir doch alleine sind und der Glaube nur ein billiger Trost?"

Entstanden ist diese Geschichte aus massiven Zweifeln an die Existenz Gottes und half dem Autor zu entscheiden, ob er dem Glauben eine weitere Chance geben sollte.

Magisterarbeit aus dem Jahr 2009 im Fachbereich Medien / Kommunikation - Journalismus, Publizistik, Note: 1,0, Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Institut fur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), Sprache: Deutsch, Anmerkungen: Die Magisterarbeit befasst sich mit der Presseberichterstattung in der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung und der tageszeitung im Zeitraum von April bis Juli 1994. Berucksichtigt werden Artikel, die sich mit dem Volkermord in Ruanda befassen, diese werden nach der Dusseldorfer Methode analysiert. Dabei stehen Lexik, Metaphorik und Argumentation im Mittelpunkt., Abstract: Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit der Presseberichterstattung zum Volkermord, der von April bis Juli 1994 im zentralafrikanischen Staat Ruanda stattgefunden hat. Hierzu wurde ein Korpus aus Zeitungsartikeln bestimmt, das nach verschiedenen Kriterien untersucht wird. Dies geschieht in Form einer Diskursanalyse nach dem Modell der so genannten Dusseldorfer Schule. Die zentrale Frage, die dabei beantwortet werden soll, lautet: Welches Afrika-Bild zeigt sich in der Berichterstattung deutscher Tageszeitungen zum Volkermord in Ruanda?