|
Books > Law > Jurisprudence & general issues > Legal profession
Judges and legal scholars talk past one another, if they have any
conversation at all. Academics couch their criticisms of judicial
decisions in theoretical terms, which leads many judges-at the risk
of intellectual stagnation-to dismiss most academic discourse as
opaque and divorced from reality. In Divergent Paths, Richard
Posner turns his attention to this widening gap within the legal
profession, reflecting on its causes and consequences and asking
what can be done to close or at least narrow it. The shortcomings
of academic legal analysis are real, but they cannot disguise the
fact that the modern judiciary has several serious deficiencies
that academic research and teaching could help to solve or
alleviate. In U.S. federal courts, which is the focus of Posner's
analysis of the judicial path, judges confront ever more difficult
cases, many involving complex and arcane scientific and
technological distinctions, yet continue to be wedded to legal
traditions sometimes centuries old. Posner asks how legal education
can be made less theory-driven and more compatible with the present
and future demands of judging and lawyering. Law schools, he points
out, have great potential to promote much-needed improvements in
the judiciary, but doing so will require significant changes in
curriculum, hiring policy, and methods of educating future judges.
If law schools start to focus more on practical problems facing the
American legal system rather than on debating its theoretical
failures, the gulf separating the academy and the judiciary will
narrow.
 |
Rough Edges
(Paperback)
James Rogan; Foreword by Newt Gingrich
|
R601
Discovery Miles 6 010
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
Dieser Buchtitel ist Teil des Digitalisierungsprojekts Springer
Book Archives mit Publikationen, die seit den Anfangen des Verlags
von 1842 erschienen sind. Der Verlag stellt mit diesem Archiv
Quellen fur die historische wie auch die disziplingeschichtliche
Forschung zur Verfugung, die jeweils im historischen Kontext
betrachtet werden mussen. Dieser Titel erschien in der Zeit vor
1945 und wird daher in seiner zeittypischen politisch-ideologischen
Ausrichtung vom Verlag nicht beworben.
|
|