|
|
Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > Other warfare & defence issues
Atrocity. Genocide. War crime. Crime Against Humanity. Such
atrocity labels have been popularized among international lawmakers
but with little insight offered into how and when these terms are
applied and to what effect. What constitutes an event to be termed
a genocide or war crime and what role does this play in the
application of legal proceedings? Markus P. Beham, through an
interdisciplinary and comparative approach, unpicks these terms to
uncover their historical genesis and their implications for
international criminal law initiatives concerned with atrocity. The
book uniquely compares four specific case studies: Belgian colonial
exploitation of the Congo, atrocities committed against the Herero
and Nama in German South-West Africa, the Armenian genocide and the
man-made Ukrainian famine of the 1930s. Encompassing international
law, legal history, and discourse analysis, the concept of
'atrocity labelling' is used to capture the meaning underlying the
work of international lawyers and prosecutors, historians and
sociologists, agenda setters and policy makers.
Prison Pens presents the memoir of a captured Confederate soldier
in northern Virginia and the letters he exchanged with his fiancee
during the Civil War. Wash Nelson and Mollie Scollay's letters, as
well as Nelson's own manuscript memoir, provide rare insight into a
world of intimacy, despair, loss, and reunion in the Civil War
South. The tender voices in the letters combined with Nelson's
account of his time as a prisoner of war provide a story that is
personal and political, revealing the daily life of those living in
the Confederacy and the harsh realities of being an imprisoned
soldier. Ultimately, through the juxtaposition of the letters and
memoir, Prison Pens provides an opportunity for students and
scholars to consider the role of memory and incarceration in
retelling the Confederate past and incubating Lost Cause
mythology.,br> This book will be accompanied by a digital
component: a website that allows students and scholars to interact
with the volume's content and sources via an interactive map,
digitized letters, and special lesson plans.
This innovative collection offers one of the first analyses of
criminologies of the military from an interdisciplinary
perspective. While some criminologists have examined the military
in relation to the area of war crimes, this collection considers a
range of other important but less explored aspects such as private
military actors, insurgents, paramilitary groups and the role of
military forces in tackling transnational crime. Drawing upon
insights from criminology, this book's editors also consider the
ways the military institution harbours criminal activity within its
ranks and deals with prisoners of war. The contributions, by
leading experts in the field, have a broad reach and take a truly
global approach to the subject.
This important book analyzes nuclear weapon and energy policies in
Asia, a region at risk for high-stakes military competition,
conflict, and terrorism. The contributors explore the trajectory of
debates over nuclear energy, security, and nonproliferation in key
countries-China, India, Japan, Pakistan, South Korea, Taiwan,
Vietnam, and other states in the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN). Arguing against conventional wisdom, the
contributors make a convincing case that domestic variables are far
more powerful than external factors in shaping nuclear decision
making. The book explores what drives debates and how decisions are
framed, the interplay between domestic dynamics and geopolitical
calculations in the discourse, where the center of gravity of
debates lies in each country, and what this means for regional
cooperation or competition and U.S. nuclear energy and
nonproliferation policy in Asia.
This book explores the diverse ways in which Holocaust
representations have influenced and structured how other genocides
are understood and represented in the West. Rebecca Jinks focuses
in particular on the canonical 20th century cases of genocide:
Armenia, Cambodia, Bosnia, and Rwanda. Using literature, film,
photography, and memorialisation, she demonstrates that we can only
understand the Holocaust's status as a 'benchmark' for other
genocides if we look at the deeper, structural resonances which
subtly shape many representations of genocide. Representing
Genocide pursues five thematic areas in turn: how genocides are
recognised as such by western publics; the representation of the
origins and perpetrators of genocide; how western witnesses
represent genocide; representations of the aftermath of genocide;
and western responses to genocide. Throughout, the book
distinguishes between 'mainstream' and other, more nuanced and
engaged, representations of genocide. It shows how these mainstream
representations - the majority - largely replicate the
representational framework of the Holocaust, including the way in
which mainstream Holocaust representations resist recognising the
rationality, instrumentality and normality of genocide, preferring
instead to present it as an aberrant, exceptional event in human
society. By contrast, the more engaged representations - often, but
not always, originating from those who experienced genocide - tend
to revolve around precisely genocide's ordinariness, and the
structures and situations common to human society which contribute
to and become involved in the violence.
'Zekameron' comes from 'Zek' meaning prisoner and is a word-play on
Boccaccio's Decameron. 'He came back from interrogation looking
like death. Some people look better than he did when they're being
put in their coffin. "What happened then? Did they stick any other
articles of the Criminal Code on you? Or break your jaw?" "Nothing
like that. I've got toothache..." The 100 tales in Zekameron are
based on the 14th Century Decameron, but Znak is closer to Beckett
than to Boccaccio. Banality and brutality vie with the human
ability to overcome oppression. Znak's stories in different voices
chart 100 days in prison in Belarus today. The tone is laconic,
ironic; the humour sparse. The stories bear witness to resistance
and self-assertion and the genuine warmth and appreciation of
fellow prisoners.
|
|