Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
|
Buy Now
The Scandal of Reason - A Critical Theory of Political Judgment (Paperback)
Loot Price: R620
Discovery Miles 6 200
|
|
The Scandal of Reason - A Critical Theory of Political Judgment (Paperback)
Series: New Directions in Critical Theory, 47
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Theories of justice are haunted by a paradox: the more ambitious
the theory of justice, the less applicable and useful the model is
to political practice; yet the more politically realistic the
theory, the weaker its moral ambition, rendering it unsound and
equally useless. Brokering a resolution to this "judgment paradox,"
Albena Azmanova advances a "critical consensus model" of judgment
that serves the normative ideals of a just society without the help
of ideal theory. Tracing the evolution of two major traditions in
political philosophy-critical theory and philosophical
liberalism-and the way they confront the judgment paradox, Azmanova
critiques prevailing models of deliberative democracy and their
preference for ideal theory over political applicability. Instead,
she replaces the reliance on normative models of democracy with an
account of the dynamics of reasoned judgment produced in democratic
practices of open dialogues. Combining Hannah Arendt's study of
judgment with Pierre Bourdieu's social critique of power relations,
and incorporating elements of political epistemology from Kant,
Wittgenstein, H. L. A. Hart, Max Weber, and American philosophical
pragmatism, Azmanova centers her inquiry on the way participants in
moral conflicts attribute meaning to their grievances of injustice.
She then demonstrates the emancipatory potential of the model of
critical deliberative judgment she forges and its capacity to guide
policy making. This model's critical force yields from its capacity
to disclose the common structural sources of injustice behind
conflicting claims to justice. Moving beyond the conflict between
universalist and pluralist positions, Azmanova grounds the question
of "what is justice?" in the empirical reality of "who suffers?" in
order to discern attainable possibilities for a less unjust world.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.