Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Social law > Environment law
|
Buy Now
Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes (Paperback)
Loot Price: R533
Discovery Miles 5 330
|
|
Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R533
Discovery Miles 5 330
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Federal mandatory minimum sentencing statutes limit the discretion
of a sentencing court to impose a sentence that does not include a
term of imprisonment or the death penalty. They have a long history
and come in several varieties: the not-less-than, the flat
sentence, and piggyback versions. Federal courts may refrain from
imposing an otherwise required statutory mandatory minimum sentence
when requested by the prosecution on the basis of substantial
assistance toward the prosecution of others. First-time, low-level,
non-violent offenders may be able to avoid the mandatory minimums
under the Controlled Substances Acts, if they are completely
forthcoming. The most common imposed federal mandatory minimum
sentences arise under the Controlled Substance and Controlled
Substance Import and Export Acts, the provisions punishing the
presence of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or
drug trafficking offense, the Armed Career Criminal Act, various
sex crimes include child pornography, and aggravated identity
theft. Critics argue that mandatory minimums undermine the
rationale and operation of the federal sentencing guidelines which
are designed to eliminate unwarranted sentencing disparity. Counter
arguments suggest that the guidelines themselves operate to
undermine individual sentencing discretion and that the ills
attributed to other mandatory minimums are more appropriately
assigned to prosecutorial discretion or other sources. State and
federal mandatory minimums have come under constitutional attack on
several grounds over the years, and have generally survived. The
Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishments clause does bar
mandatory capital punishment, and apparently bans any term of
imprisonment that is grossly disproportionate to the seriousness of
the crime for which it is imposed. The Supreme Court, however, has
declined to overturn sentences imposed under the California three
strikes law and challenged as cruel and unusual. Double jeopardy,
ex post facto, due process, separation of powers, and equal
protection challenges have been generally unavailing. The United
States Sentencing Commission's Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the
Federal Criminal Justice System (2011) recommends consideration of
amendments to several of the statutes under which federal mandatory
minimum sentences are most often imposed.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.