The fall of communism in the Soviet Union led many to hope and
expect that liberal democracy would immediately take root across
postcommunist states, marking what Francis Fukuyama famously
referred to as the "end of history." Since then, however, a very
different picture has emerged, most notably in the form of
nationalist sentiments that have steered many postcommunist
countries in an illiberal direction, even in regimes committed to
market reforms and formally democratic institutions.
Cheng Chen examines this phenomenon in comparative perspective,
showing that the different pathways of nation-building under
Leninism affected the character of Leninist regimes and, later, the
differential prospects for liberal democracy in the postcommunist
era. In China and Russia, Chen shows, liberalism and nationalism
were more difficult to reconcile because Leninism was indigenous
and had a more significant impact on nation-building. In Hungary
and Romania, by contrast, Leninism was a foreign import and had
less of an effect on traditional national identity. As we witness
the struggle to establish democracy in places such as Afghanistan
and Iraq, a study that examines the salience of historical legacies
seems particularly timely.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!