The creation of temporary, independent advisory bodies that give
advice to Congress, is an important yet under-investigated area of
congressional delegation. With variations to fit the circumstances,
lawmakers entrust commissions to accomplish diverse goals, such as
coping with increases in the scope and complexity of legislation,
forging consensus, drafting legislation, finessing institutional
obstacles, coordinating strategy, and promoting party unity.
Campbell investigates why and when Congress formulates policy by
commissions rather than by the normal legislative process. He shows
that many variables go into the decision to entrust those bodies to
render non-partisan recommendations. According to lawmakers and
their staff, the three primary justifications for choosing to
delegate to commission include expertise, workload, and avoidance.
Which of these three dominates depends in large part on the
politics surrounding a particular issue and the nature of the
policy problem. The logic of delegation to each of the three
commission types is different. Which reason dominates depends in
large part on the politics surrounding the issue and the nature of
the legislative policy problem. Scholars, students, and other
researchers involved with Congress, American government, and public
policy will find the study of particular interest.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!