For writers in the early modern period, thinking about royal
favorites inevitably meant thinking about the uneasy intersection
of the personal and the public in a political system traditionally
organized around patronage and intimacy. Depictions of favoritism -
in a variety of texts including plays, poems, libels, and pamphlets
- explore the most fundamental ideological questions concerning
personal monarchy and the early modern public sphere, questions
about the nature and limits of prerogative and about the
enfranchisement or otherwise of subjects. In this study, Curtis
Perry examines the ideological underpinnings of the heated
controversies surrounding powerful royal favorites and the idea of
favoritism in the late Elizabethan and early Stuart period. Perry
argues that the discourse of corrupt favoritism is this period's
most important unofficial vehicle for exploring constitutional
unease concerning the nature and limits of personal monarchy within
the balanced English constitution.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!