While there are far more women in public office today than in
previous eras, women are still vastly underrepresented in this area
relative to men. Conventional wisdom suggests that a key reason is
because female candidates start out at a disadvantage with the
public, compared to male candidates, and then face higher standards
for their behavior and qualifications as they campaign. "He Runs,
She Runs" is the first comprehensive study of these dynamics and
demonstrates that the conventional wisdom is wrong.
With rich contextual background and a wealth of findings,
Deborah Jordan Brooks examines whether various behaviors--such as
crying, acting tough, displays of anger, or knowledge gaffes--by
male and female political candidates are regarded differently by
the public. Refuting the idea of double standards in campaigns,
Brooks's overall analysis indicates that female candidates do not
get penalized disproportionately for various behaviors, nor do they
face any double bind regarding femininity and toughness. Brooks
also reveals that before campaigning begins, women do not start out
at a disadvantage due to gender stereotypes. In fact, Brooks shows
that people only make gendered assumptions about candidates who are
new to politics, and those stereotypes benefit, rather than hurt,
women candidates.
Proving that it is no more challenging for female political
candidates today to win over the public than it is for their male
counterparts, "He Runs, She Runs" makes clear that we need to look
beyond public attitudes to understand why more women are not in
office.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!