Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Central government > Central government policies
|
Buy Now
A Climate for Change (Paperback)
Loot Price: R806
Discovery Miles 8 060
|
|
A Climate for Change (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics -
Economic Policy, course: Harvard College China-India Development
and Relations Symposium, New York 03-04/2007, 0 entries in the
bibliography, language: English, comment: This essay presents a
concept for international economic climate change mitigation after
Kyoto. It tries and bridges the negotiation positions of the US,
India and China to suggest -based on the moral philosophies of John
Rawls- a system for mitigation that is not only cost-efficient but
also equitable. Presented in Peking University and Harvard
China-India Development and Relations Symposium where this work was
selected for a 'Certificated of Merit', abstract: One of the major
vindications for the US not signing Kyoto is that the treaty does
not contain any legally binding emission reduction targets for
China and India, although these countries have become respectively
the second and fifth biggest emitter of CO2. India and China -in
return- claim that a path of development that would not harm the
climate is too expensive for them; the West has to pay for a
historical responsibility that stems from its past emissions, which
brought about anthropogenic climate change in the first place. In
this way the blame is passed from one nation to the other, and in
the meantime all three countries keep on increasing their gross
emissions. The essay identifies that part of the problem is the
current perspective in intergovernmental emission reduction
negotiation. All negotiation is about how much the global
top-polluters agree to reduce their emissions. Kyoto left open to
what value of CO2-equivalent countries ultimately have to reduce
their emissions. Thus it was also not possible to tell how much
India and China can increase their emissions. The essay
rationalises how the exclusiveness of a top-down negotiation
increases the cost of climate change mitigation in the US, as in
China and India, by constricting the US-suggestion of international
CO
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.