The modern concept of disability did not exist in the Romantic
period. This study addresses the anachronistic use of 'disability'
in scholarship of the Romantic era, providing a disability studies
theorized account that explores the relationship between ideas of
function and aesthetics. Unpacking the politics of ability, the
book reveals the centrality of capacity and weakness concepts to
the egalitarian politics of the 1790s, and the importance of desert
theory to debates about sentiment and the charitable relief of
impaired soldiers. Clarifying the aesthetics of deformity as
distinct from discussions of ability, Joshua uncovers a controversy
over the use of deformity in picturesque aesthetics, offers
accounts of deformity that anticipate recent disability studies
theory, and discusses deformity and monstrosity as a blended
category in Frankenstein. Setting aside the modern concept of
disability, Joshua cogently argues for the historical and critical
value of period-specific terms.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!