A generation ago, scholars saw interest groups as the single
most important element in the American political system. Today,
political scientists are more likely to see groups as a marginal
influence compared to institutions such as Congress, the
presidency, and the judiciary. Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech
show that scholars have veered from one extreme to another not
because of changes in the political system, but because of changes
in political science. They review hundreds of books and articles
about interest groups from the 1940s to today; examine the
methodological and conceptual problems that have beset the field;
and suggest research strategies to return interest-group studies to
a position of greater relevance.
The authors begin by explaining how the group approach to
politics became dominant forty years ago in reaction to the
constitutional-legal approach that preceded it. They show how it
fell into decline in the 1970s as scholars ignored the impact of
groups on government to focus on more quantifiable but narrower
subjects, such as collective-action dilemmas and the dynamics of
recruitment. As a result, despite intense research activity, we
still know very little about how groups influence day-to-day
governing. Baumgartner and Leech argue that scholars need to
develop a more coherent set of research questions, focus on
large-scale studies, and pay more attention to the context of group
behavior. Their book will give new impetus and direction to a field
that has been in the academic wilderness too long.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!