The present international system, composed for the most part of
sovereign, territorial states, is often viewed as the inevitable
outcome of historical development. Hendrik Spruyt argues that there
was nothing inevitable about the rise of the state system, however.
Examining the competing institutions that arose during the decline
of feudalism--among them urban leagues, independent communes, city
states, and sovereign monarchies--Spruyt disposes of the familiar
claim that the superior size and war-making ability of the
sovereign nation-state made it the natural successor to the feudal
system.
The author argues that feudalism did not give way to any single
successor institution in simple linear fashion. Instead,
individuals created a variety of institutional forms, such as the
sovereign, territorial state in France, the Hanseatic League, and
the Italian city-states, in reaction to a dramatic change in the
medieval economic environment. Only in a subsequent selective phase
of institutional evolution did sovereign, territorial authority
prove to have significant institutional advantages over its rivals.
Sovereign authority proved to be more successful in organizing
domestic society and structuring external affairs. Spruyt's
interdisciplinary approach not only has important implications for
change in the state system in our time, but also presents a novel
analysis of the general dynamics of institutional change.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!