The word is all over Austen's novels: what ought to be done, what
one ought to say, how one ought to feel (versus how one does feel).
When Austen's characters employ an ought, the delicate oscillation
between first- and third-person perspectives that marks her prose
leads the reader to distinguish between what they say, and what
they ought, according to a morally idealized, third-person
calculus, to mean. But what is the context of this ought? This book
situates the disinterested, reflective appeal to moral principle
invoked_ironically or otherwise_in Austen's oughts within the
history of thought about judgment in the British eighteenth
century. Beginning with Shaftesbury's critique of Locke's account
of judgment, successive readings explore the emphasis on
disinterest in works by David Hume, Adam Smith, Samuel Richardson,
and Sir Joshua Reynolds alongside discussions of Jane Austen's
major novels.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!